Score only. The Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria compares the Jinko Swan Bifacial solar panel against the industries best known specifications. The result, a solar module comparison with no room for discretionary bias and the transparency you desire.ย ย 

.Make and model:ย  Jinko Solar Swan.

Variants: 320 / 325 / 330 / 335 / 340W.

ย  Design, Performance.

ย  Durability.

Design.

Jinko Solar

Swan Design; ELITE
  • P-type Monocystralline.
  • 5-ribbon front contact.
  • PERC enhanced.
  • Glass-laminate (transparent) or glass-glass.
  • Innovative.
  • InterSolar Winner 2019.
  • TUV certified.
4.6

Durability.

Jinko Solar

Swan Durability; GOOD
  • Snow load 5400Pa.
  • Front wind load 2400Pa.
  • Rear wind load 2400Pa.
  • Damp heat testing 2000Hrs .
  • Thermal cycle testing 600Hrs.
  • PID resistant.
  • Salt mist resistance certification
    IEC 61701.
  • Amonia resistance certification
    IEC 62716.
  • Hail impact IEC standard.
3.1

Efficiency.

Jinko Solar

Swan Efficiency; SUPERIOR
  • 19.7% Maximum module efficiency.
  • -0.35%ยฐC Temperature coefficient.
  • 0/3% Power tolerance.
4.0

Performance.

Jinko Solar

Swan Performance; ELITE
  • 2.5% degradation in the 1st year.
  • 0.5% degradation per annum.
  • 30-year linear performance warranty.
  • Parts and service performance warranty.
4.5

Guarantee.

Jinko Solar

Swan Guarantee; VERY GOOD
  • 12-year warranty.
  • Parts & service warranty.
  • Authorised installer network with no additional end-user benefits.
3.7

OVERALL.

Jinko Solar

Swan Overall; SUPERIOR
  • Design 4.4
  • Durability 3.1
  • Efficiency 4.0
  • Performance 4.5
  • Guarantee 3.7
4.0

Comparison.

Outstanding
[ 4.8 - 5 ] The pinnacle of certified specification.
Elite
[ 4.3 - 4.7 ] A rare calibre of technology produced by the industry elite.
Superior
[ 3.8 - 4.2 ] Specifications which are exceedingly superior to that of the industry average.
Very Good
[ 3.3 - 3.7 ] Advanced technology against the industry average.
Good
[ 2.8 - 3.2 ] Better than the industry average is that of which strives a portion better.
Average
[ 2.3 - 2.7 ] A score within this bracket is considered the industry average specification.
Ordinary
[ 1.8 - 2.2 ] Considered below the industry mainstream average.
Poor
[ 1.3 - 1.7 ] There's better, there's also worse.
Inferior
[ 0.8 - 1.2 ] Far below the modern industry average.
Awful
[ 0.3 - 0.7 ] Possesses specifications which are absent or unverified by a certified testing institute.
Avoid
[ 0 - 0.2 ] Unlikely for technology manufactured in the modern era.
Previous
Next

Insight.

How was the score for the Jinko Swan range of solar panels calculated? By using the Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria V2.4 >

How does the entire current range of Jinko Solar panels compare against each other? Discover now >

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here