Score only. The Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria compares the Jinko Tiger solar panel against the industries best known specifications. The result, a solar module comparison with no room for discretionary bias and the transparency you desire.  

.

Make and model:  Jinko Tiger Mono-facial.

Variants:   375 / 380 / 385 / 390 / 395 W.

  Design, Performance.

  Durability.

The following content for the Jinko Tiger should be used as a guide only. Individual circumstances and compatibilities should always be taken into account when selecting the right solar panel for any given installation. This content has been built using the Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria 2.0 and above based on available product specifications at the time of writing. 

Design.

Jinko

Tiger Design; ELITE
  • N-type mono cell (P-type avail).
  • Shingled-cell.
  • PERC enhanced.
  • Glass-laminate (White).​
  • EUPD Research Top Brand PV Modules Award 2019.
  • Innovative design.
  • TÜV Rheinland certified.

Durability.

Jinko

Tiger Durability; VERY GOOD
  • Snow load 5400Pa.
  • Front wind load 2400Pa .
  • Rear wind load 2400Pa.
  • Damp heat testing 2000Hrs.
  • Thermal cycle testing 600Hrs.
  • PID Free.
  • Salt mist resistance EC 61701.
  • Amonia resistance IEC 62716.
  • Hail impact IEC standard.

Efficiency.

Jinko

Tiger Efficiency; SUPERIOR
  • 21% maximum module efficiency.
  • -0.35%/°C Temperature coefficient.
  • 0~+3% Power tolerance.

Performance.

Jinko

Tiger Performance; OUTSTANDING
  • 1% degradation in the 1st year..
  • 0.4% degradation per annum.
  • 30-year linear performance warranty.
  • Parts & service performance warranty.

Guarantee.

Jinko

Tiger Guarantee; SUPERIOR
  • 15-year warranty.
  • Parts & service warranty.
  • Authorised installer network with no additional benefits.

OVERALL.

Jinko

Tiger Overall; SUPERIOR
  • Design 4.4
  • Durability 3.4
  • Efficiency 4.2
  • Performance 4.8
  • Guarantee 3.8
Outstanding
[ 4.8 - 5 ] The pinnacle of certified specification.
Elite
[ 4.3 - 4.7 ] A rare calibre of technology produced by the industry elite.
Superior
[ 3.8 - 4.2 ] Specifications which are exceedingly superior to that of the industry average.
Very Good
[ 3.3 - 3.7 ] Advanced technology against the industry average.
Good
[ 2.8 - 3.2 ] Better than the industry average is that of which strives a portion better.
Average
[ 2.3 - 2.7 ] A score within this bracket is considered the industry average specification.
Ordinary
[ 1.8 - 2.2 ] Considered below the industry mainstream average.
Poor
[ 1.3 - 1.7 ] There's better, there's also worse.
Inferior
[ 0.8 - 1.2 ] Far below the modern industry average.
Awful
[ 0.3 - 0.7 ] Possesses specifications which are absent or unverified by a certified testing institute.
Avoid
[ 0 - 0.2 ] Unlikely for technology manufactured in the modern era.
Previous
Next

Insight.

How was the score for the Jinko Tiger range of solar panels calculated? By using the Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria V2.4 >

How does the entire current range of Jinko Solar panels compare against each other? Discover now >

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here