Score only. The Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria compares the Seraphim Blade Series solar panel against the industries best known specifications. The result, a solar module comparison with no room for discretionary bias and the transparency you desire.  

.

Make and model:  Seraphim Blade Series.

Variants:  315, 320, 325, 330W.

  Design, Performance.

  Guarantee.

The following content for the Seraphim Blade Series should be used as a guide only. Individual circumstances and compatibilities should always be taken into account when selecting the right solar panel for any given installation. This content has been built using the Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria 2.0 and above based on available product specifications at the time of writing. 

Design.

Seraphim

Blade Design; SUPERIOR
  • Monocrystalline.
  • 5-ribbon front contact.
  • PERC enhanced.
  • Glass-laminate (White).
  • Inspiring.
  • Seraphim Recognized as 2019 Top Performer by PVEL/DNV GL.
  • TÜV Certified.

Durability.

Seraphim

Blade Durability; VERY GOOD
  • Snow load 5400Pa.
  • Front wind load 2400Pa.
  • Rear wind load 2400Pa.
  • Damp heat testing 3000Hrs .
  • Thermal cycle testing 600Hrs.
  • Anti-PID.
  • Salt mist resistance certification
    IEC 61701.
  • Amonia resistance certification
    IEC 62716.
  • 7.53 grams hail impact at 23m/s.

Efficiency.

Seraphim

Blade Efficiency; VERY GOOD
  • 19.4% Maximum module efficiency.
  • -0.38%°C Temperature coefficient.
  • 0/3% Power tolerance.

Performance.

Seraphim

Blade Performance; SUPERIOR
  • 3% degradation in the 1st year.
  • 0.6% degradation per annum.
  • 25-year linear performance warranty.
  • Parts & service only performance warranty.

Guarantee.

Seraphim

Blade Guarantee; VERY GOOD
  • 15-year warranty.
  • Parts & service warranty.
  • No authorised installer network.

OVERALL.

Seraphim

Blade Overall; VERY GOOD
  • Design 4.1
  • Durability 3.2
  • Efficiency 3.5
  • Performance 4.0
  • Guarantee 3.7

Comparison.

wpDataChart with provided ID not found!
Outstanding
[ 4.8 - 5 ] The pinnacle of certified specification.
Elite
[ 4.3 - 4.7 ] A rare calibre of technology produced by the industry elite.
Superior
[ 3.8 - 4.2 ] Specifications which are exceedingly superior to that of the industry average.
Very Good
[ 3.3 - 3.7 ] Advanced technology against the industry average.
Good
[ 2.8 - 3.2 ] Better than the industry average is that of which strives a portion better.
Average
[ 2.3 - 2.7 ] A score within this bracket is considered the industry average specification.
Ordinary
[ 1.8 - 2.2 ] Considered below the industry mainstream average.
Poor
[ 1.3 - 1.7 ] There's better, there's also worse.
Inferior
[ 0.8 - 1.2 ] Far below the modern industry average.
Awful
[ 0.3 - 0.7 ] Possesses specifications which are absent or unverified by a certified testing institute.
Avoid
[ 0 - 0.2 ] Unlikely for technology manufactured in the modern era.
Previous
Next

Insight.

How was the score for the Seraphim SII Series range of solar panels calculated? By using the Solar Review Module Assessment Criteria V2.4 >

How does the entire current range of Seraphim solar panels compare against each other? Discover now >

REVIEW OVERVIEW
Design
Durability
Efficiency
Performance
Guarantee
Previous articleSCORE | Seraphim SIII Series 360 – 375W.
Next articleREVIEW | Huawei SUN2000L 2 – 5 kW (updated).
End-user focused solar & energy product feature website. Solar panels, inverters, batteries & monitoring software reviews.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here