Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Premium Performance

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass640–660 W

AIKO | AIKO-G640-MCH72Mw through AIKO-G660-MCH72Mw (144 half-cells, N-type ABC rear-contact); scored model AIKO-G660-MCH72Mw

72-cell

66/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-17

24.4% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp Coeff
Full scorecard
Premium Performance

Comet 1N590–615 W

AIKO | AIKO-A615-MAH72Mw

72-cellMono-glassABCRear contact

78/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 79%

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

Back-Contact CellClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-ProvenPVEL Top Performer
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureComet 2U72 Mono-GlassComet 1N
Architecture & Design83 / 10086 / 100
Efficiency & Yield74 / 10073 / 100
Durability (verified)52 / 10081 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10078 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone44 / 10064 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10080 / 100

Architecture & Design

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
83 / 100
Comet 1N
86 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
74 / 100
Comet 1N
73 / 100

Durability (verified)

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
52 / 100
Comet 1N
81 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
78 / 100
Comet 1N
78 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
44 / 100
Comet 1N
64 / 100

Sustainability

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
46 / 100
Comet 1N
80 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureComet 2U72 Mono-GlassComet 1N
ArchitectureSolar moduleABC module
Published rated power range640–660 W590–615 W
Scored benchmark660 W615 W
Power660 W615 W
Efficiency24.4 % (better value on this row)23.8 %
CellN-type ABCN-type ABC silicon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.26 %/°C

Architecture

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
Solar module
Comet 1N
ABC module

Published rated power range

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
640–660 W
Comet 1N
590–615 W

Scored benchmark

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
660 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Power

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
660 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Efficiency

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
24.4 % (better value on this row)
Comet 1N
23.8 %

Cell

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
N-type ABC
Comet 1N
N-type ABC silicon

Temp coeff

Comet 2U72 Mono-Glass
-0.26 %/°C
Comet 1N
-0.26 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallComet 1N leads the global score by 12 points.
Strongest dimensionsComet 2U72 Mono-Glass: Architecture & Design · Comet 1N: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceComet 1N has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (34 points).
Evidence coverageComet 2U72 Mono-Glass: strong evidence coverage (100%) · Comet 1N: strong evidence coverage (79%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Premium Performance class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.