The scoring engine
How a score is built
Each product is scored against a published rubric of weighted pillars. Each pillar contains criteria. Each criterion maps a measured specification to a band (0–100 pts). Pillar scores are weighted averages of their criteria. The overall score is a weighted average of pillar scores. The same arithmetic runs on every product. No editorial adjustments.
What happens when a spec is missing
Every criterion declares a missing mode. Floor (40 pts): the manufacturer did not disclose this figure. Non-disclosure is penalised. Neutral (50 pts): this axis is not universally published in this product class. Absence is not penalised but nothing is assumed. Exclude: the criterion is dropped and the remaining pillar weights renormalised. Used for data not yet collected, or for axes that genuinely do not apply to a product.
Classes, not one leaderboard
Products are sorted into market classes (e.g., Premium European, Performance & Value) and judged within those classes. A boutique premium product should not be ranked against a volume residential product on scale, and vice versa. The class system prevents misleading cross-segment comparisons while still publishing all scores.
International publication
review.solar is an international publication. The root international safety standards (IEC 62109 for inverters; IEC 62619 for batteries; IEC 61215/61730 for panels) are the primary certification reference. National grid-connection overlays (AU AS/NZS 4777.2 + CEC; US UL 1741; EU VDE) are market-specific layers applied by regional distributors at installation. A product certified to the international base standard is not penalised for the absence of a regional national listing.
Evidence and market context
Every audit-sheet row is labelled as sourced, reviewed absence, estimated, derived, or not found. Reviewed absence means the linked exact-product material was checked but did not publish the qualifying detail. It is evidence of non-disclosure in the reviewed material, not proof that a capability can never exist. Not found is reserved for rows where no direct source has been located. An estimate or missing source is never presented as a verified fact. Product scorecards also state when their market review was last checked. A product marked market review not yet completed has no implied availability, certification, warranty or installer-compatibility claim for your location: confirm those points before purchase.
Why no product scores 100
The ceiling is anchored to the technological frontier, not the best current product: a hypothetical module, battery or inverter that is best-in-class on every criterion simultaneously. No real product achieves that, so even the market leader keeps visible headroom, and the top rating tiers stay reserved for genuine advances. The scale is a distance-to-frontier measure, which is why it rewards progress instead of declaring a winner "perfect".
Ageing technology: successor flags and the legacy tier
Technology moves. We mark that in two escalating steps, and neither ever changes a product's score. First, a successor flag: when a clear next-generation model exists in the same manufacturer series, the older model carries a sourced amber note linking to its successor. Its score is unchanged and it stays in active assessment: the flag simply tells you a newer generation exists. Second, the legacy tier: when a product is genuinely end-of-life, either because the manufacturer has attested it is retired or because we can source that it is no longer made or sold, it moves to a frozen legacy record. A legacy product keeps the exact score it held on its last active day, stamped with the rubric version and the date it was archived; it leaves active leaderboards and class-champion contention but stays visible and linkable for anyone still running that hardware. A frozen score is never recomputed against a later rubric and is never compared like-for-like against a currently-scored product. Manufacturers may attest that their own product is retired, and we may reverse a retirement we find inaccurate; a manufacturer can influence whether their product is listed as current or retired, but never its score, and never any product's rank. Retiring a product is proven not to change any other product's score or rating.
What the score represents
Every score is tied to a named model or configuration. For panels, thin-film modules and inverters, the benchmark uses the highest published output only inside one physical, electrical and market-certification series; a lower model stays visibly in research until the maximum model's variant-sensitive evidence has been checked. Batteries instead show the supported capacity range and retain a named reference configuration, because a larger stack is not inherently a better battery. Plug-in ESS records score one exact model and publish grid-injection, backup and storage metrics separately. Regional ranges are kept distinct from the global family so an Australian maximum is never silently presented as a worldwide one.
External data sources
Scores draw on: manufacturer datasheets and warranty documents (primary sources, archived copies hosted under /sources/); IEC standards (61215, 61730, 61701, 62716, 62109, 62619, TS 62804); UL 9540A and UL 1741; AS/NZS 4777.2; independent test programmes: PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard, RETC, DNV battery scorecard, HTW Berlin Stromspeicher-Inspektion (RSP/SPI), ITP Renewables; BNEF Tier-1 lists (displayed, never scored); and peer-reviewed literature cited in individual rubric changelogs. What each of those third-party sources actually establishes, and which decision it answers, is set out in Three names on a spec sheet.
Methodology change log
Every rubric change is versioned and dated. Expand a rubric for its full history.
Panels15 versions · latest v2.10.0
- v2.10.0 (2026-08-01): Score-neutral panel-taxonomy migration. The former 'Cell architecture' scoring field is now explicitly named 'Cell technology tier', and every categorical band maps one-for-one to its previous score.
- v2.9.0 (2026-07-31): Evidence state now affects the score. A criterion whose provenance marks it an editorial estimate keeps its band and is pulled 25% of the way toward the non-disclosure floor of 40, so an estimated band of 100 scores 85 and an estimated band of 60 scores 55.
- v2.8.0 (2026-07-11): Warranty-insurance backing removed as a scoring path in 'Financial strength & warranty backing'; top band retitled 'Investment-grade or insured warranty' -> 'Investment-grade (rated)'.
- v2.7.0 (2026-07-11): Retire 'Low-light / IAM coefficient' and fold the low-light prior into Cell architecture (deep-research 2026-07, Pass 3 + datasheet audit).
- v2.6.0 (2026-07-10): Reliability-dial refinement; implements the governance 'never-tested vs lapsed' decision (governance_and_roadmap.md; deep-research 2026-07-10).
- v2.5.0 (2026-07-05): Mid-field weight reallocation (rubric_review_2026-07b).
- v2.4.0 (2026-07-03): New criterion 'End-of-life & recycling disclosure' (Sustainability, [weight withheld]; Carbon footprint / EPD 1.0 -> [weight withheld]). Watch-lane promotion on publisher direction, scored as verifiable disclosure.
- v2.3.0 (2026-07-03): Implements rubric_review_2026-07.md on sourced enrichment (46/46 panels researched; every fact carries source + verbatim quote).
- v2.3.0 (2026-07-03): Implements rubric_review_2026-07.md on sourced enrichment (46/46 panels researched; every fact carries source + verbatim quote).
- v2.2.1 (2026-07-03): Missing-mode correction, floor -> exclude, for Fire classification (IEC 61730): 100% unpopulated (never enriched), so floor mode was a uniform fixed-point drag on all 46 panels for data the pipeline never collected - 'exclude' per the rubric's own missing-mode definitions. Found by engine/discrimination.py.
- v2.2.0 (2026-07-03): Encapsulation rebuilt: chemistry and evidence over form factor, split into two criteria. (1) 'Encapsulation & frame construction' (weight adjusted, floor): five bands replace the previous three.
- v2.1.0 (2026-06-20): Eight new criteria added. Durability: Hail resistance class (IEC 61215 + enhanced), Ammonia resistance (IEC 62716), Damp heat extended (2000h). Efficiency & Yield: NOCT (numeric, lower_better), Anti-soiling glass (categorical), Low-light / IAM coefficient (categorical proxy).
- v2.0.0 (2026-06-20): HPBC split from back-contact tier; first-year degradation ceiling tightened; product warranty breakpoints refreshed; TOPCon bands collapsed; IEC 61730 Class C fire classification added.
- v1.1.0-draft (2026-06-16): Retired LeTID & company-age, added independent energy yield + financial/warranty strength, eased encapsulation.
- v1.0.0 (2026-06-16): Initial release.
Batteries13 versions · latest v2.9.0
- v2.9.0 (2026-07-31): Evidence state now affects the score. A criterion whose provenance marks it an editorial estimate keeps its band and is pulled 25% of the way toward the non-disclosure floor of 40, so an estimated band of 100 scores 85 and an estimated band of 60 scores 55.
- v2.8.0 (2026-07-05): Warranty throughput normalised per kWh (rubric_review_2026-07b P4) after a 19-product sourced warranty sweep. Old vibes-bands (High/Moderate) replaced with quantified bands: unlimited-for-standard-use / >=5 MWh per kWh usable (cycle caps convert at 1000 cycles = 1 MWh/kWh) / 2.5-5 / <2.5 / not published.
- v2.7.0 (2026-07-03): New criterion 'Backup surge / motor-start capability' (Power & Efficiency, [weight withheld]; existing criteria rescaled). Watch-lane promotion. LRA published: Tesla PW3 (185 A), FranklinWH aPower 2 (185 A + 15 kW/10 s), Fox ESS PowerQ (up to 110 A).
- v2.6.0 (2026-07-03): New criterion 'Firmware & security disclosure' (Energy Ecosystem, [weight withheld]; existing criteria scaled x0.9). Promoted from the roadmap's watch-don't-score lane on publisher direction, scored as verifiable disclosure per the deterministic-methodology rule.
- v2.5.0 (2026-07-03): New criterion 'Cell provenance & traceability' (Safety & Chemistry, [weight withheld]; Cell chemistry rebalanced): cells in-house (100) / supplier named (85) / undisclosed (70).
- v2.4.1 (2026-07-03): Missing-mode correction, floor -> exclude, for the three v2.3 Intersolar criteria (Backup switching speed, Dual-port flexibility, Battery generation compatibility).
- v2.4.0 (2026-07-02): Merges the stranded 'Rubric Shifters' v2.3.0 (2026-07-01, snapshot battery_rubric_v2.3.json) which was authored but never wired into this live file or the data: discovered during the globalization sweep (two releases shared the v2.3.0 number; see globalization_guardrails.md finding 5 and guardrail G6).
- v2.3.1 (2026-07-02): Globalization migration (2026-07-02): score-neutral. Band labels for 'Grid & safety certification' and 'VPP & grid services readiness' re-authored so the top bands are defined by capability plus evidence in ANY named market, not AU-only regulatory recognition (AS/NZS 4777.2 + CEC listing, 'live AU VPP program').
- v2.3.0 (2026-06-30): Three new criteria prompted by SigenStor Neo debut at Intersolar Europe 2026. (1) 'Backup switching speed' in Power & Efficiency (weight adjusted): distinguishes true 0ms UPS topology (load always on inverter output, no relay) from <5ms relay switching from <20ms seamless.
- v2.2.0 (2026-06-20): Three new criteria added. (1) 'Cell balancing architecture' under Longevity: active cell-level balancing (energy recirculation) vs passive (dissipation) is a genuine longevity and efficiency differentiator; weight adjusted within pillar.
- v2.1.0 (2026-06-20): Replaced 'Integration & Sustainability' pillar with dedicated 'Energy Ecosystem' pillar . Five new criteria: Open protocol & API maturity, VPP & grid services readiness, EV charging integration, Thermal load management, Smart home & IoT depth.
- v2.0.0 (2026-06-20): Added 'AC terminal & connection protection' criterion in Safety & Chemistry (prompted by Sigenergy ACCC recall: AC quick-connect thermal fault). Refined 'Modularity & scalability' bands to reward fine-grained ≤5 kWh expansion increments.
- v1.0.0 (2026-06-16): Initial release.
Inverters11 versions · latest v3.6.0
- v3.6.0 (2026-07-31): Evidence state now affects the score. A criterion whose provenance marks it an editorial estimate keeps its band and is pulled 25% of the way toward the non-disclosure floor of 40, so an estimated band of 100 scores 85 and an estimated band of 60 scores 55.
- v3.5.0 (2026-07-05): Monitoring & smart features deepened 3->5 bands (rubric_review_2026-07b P3b) after a 26-product sourced enrichment sweep.
- v3.4.0 (2026-07-05): Max DC:AC oversizing ratio de-saturated (rubric_review_2026-07b): the top band began at 1.5 and 96% of the fleet scored 100, crushing genuine headroom units (1.6-2.0) into the same band. New bands a graduated threshold ladder reward real oversizing capability; the 1.5 crowd is re-banded.
- v3.3.0 (2026-07-03): New criterion 'Firmware & security disclosure' (Energy Ecosystem, [weight withheld]; existing criteria scaled x0.9). Same promotion and evidence base as battery v2.6.0.
- v3.2.0 (2026-07-03): Grid & safety certification rebuilt from a saturated gate (96% of units in one band at weight adjusted) into a certification-breadth ladder: 3+ markets (100) / 2 (90) / 1 (82) / IEC 62109 only (70) / code-only (60) / unlisted (40).
- v3.2.0 (2026-07-03): Grid & safety certification rebuilt from a saturated gate (96% of units in one band at weight adjusted) into a certification-breadth ladder: 3+ markets (100) / 2 (90) / 1 (82) / IEC 62109 only (70) / code-only (60) / unlisted (40).
- v3.1.1 (2026-07-02): Globalization migration (2026-07-02): score-neutral. Band labels for 'Grid & safety certification' and 'VPP & grid services readiness' re-authored so the top bands are defined by capability plus evidence in ANY named market, not AU-only regulatory recognition (AS/NZS 4777.2 + CEC listing, 'live AU VPP program').
- v3.1.0 (2026-06-20): Three new criteria across two pillars. (1) 'Semiconductor technology' in Efficiency: SiC (silicon carbide) and GaN (gallium nitride) inverters deliver superior efficiency under real-world partial-load conditions that IGBT-based inverters cannot match; weight adjusted within pillar.
- v3.0.0 (2026-06-20): Added 'Energy Ecosystem' pillar .
- v2.0.0 (2026-06-20): Thermal management replaces Cooling; weighted efficiency primary metric; surge/arc separated; founder heritage tier added.
- v1.0.0 (2026-06-16): Initial release.
Solar panels
81 products across silicon and thin-film. Six pillars. Thin-film (CdTe, CIGS) is scored on a separate lens calibrated to its distinct technology characteristics. It is not compared directly against crystalline silicon.
| Pillar | Weight | What it captures |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Design | 0.22 | Cell architecture tier (back-contact, HJT, TOPCon, PERC), encapsulation and frame construction (frameless dual-glass, framed dual-glass, backsheet grade), encapsulant chemistry where disclosed (POE vs EVA), contact technology, and fire classification (IEC 61730). The technology decisions that define what a panel is. |
| Durability (verified) | 0.22 | Independent reliability testing (PVEL, RETC), mechanical loading (MQT16), PID resistance (IEC TS 62804), salt mist (IEC 61701), hail resistance and ammonia resistance (IEC 62716). The criteria that determine whether a panel still performs at year 15, not just at installation. |
| Performance & Degradation | 0.20 | Guaranteed end-of-warranty output, first-year and annual degradation rates, and the performance guarantee period: the shape of the panel's output over its life. |
| Efficiency & Yield | 0.18 | Module efficiency, independent energy yield (kWh/kWp), temperature coefficient, NOCT, low-light / IAM response and bifaciality: what the panel delivers in real conditions, not just at STC. |
| Guarantee & Backbone | 0.13 | Product warranty period and assurance level, warranty transferability, financial strength and warranty backing, and manufacturing track record: whether the promise outlives the paperwork. |
| Sustainability | 0.05 | Verified carbon footprint / EPD (manufacturing emissions per kWp, independently declared) and end-of-life & recycling disclosure (published take-back program, named recycling partner or third-party-verified recyclability: a checkable document, not a green claim). |
The panel rubric covers eight criteria across durability and yield: NOCT (real-world temperature performance), hail resistance, ammonia resistance, damp heat extended, warranty transferability, low-light IAM, and expanded sustainability bands. NOCT, hail resistance, and warranty transferability use floor missing mode: non-disclosure is penalised. Ammonia resistance and damp heat use exclude missing mode: too few products currently disclose to discriminate fairly.
Rubric v2.9.0 · 66 productsHome batteries
66 residential products. Six pillars. Gateway dependency is disclosed on scorecard pages as an informational annotation. It is not scored. See the gateway note below.
| Pillar | Weight | What it captures |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity & usability | 0.11 | Usable energy as a percentage of nominal capacity (depth of discharge honesty), modularity and field-expandability in ≤5 kWh increments, and energy density / physical footprint. |
| Power & efficiency | 0.16 | AC round-trip efficiency (the energy you get back for every kWh you put in), continuous power output (determines whether the battery can run a full home load in backup), operating temperature range, particularly relevant in hot climates where batteries derate above 40°C, and backup surge / motor-start capability (published LRA or timed peak rating: the can-it-start-the-aircon spec; DC-coupled modules are excluded, their surge belongs to the paired inverter). |
| Longevity (verified) | 0.22 | Cycle life to 70% capacity, warranty throughput limit (cycles or MWh), warranty period, end-of-warranty retained capacity, independent cycle/abuse testing (DNV, ITP, HTW), cell balancing architecture (active vs passive), and warranty degradation guarantee type (linear annual-cap vs stepped midterm vs end-point only). |
| Safety & chemistry | 0.21 | Cell chemistry (LFP vs NMC), cell provenance and traceability (who actually manufactures the cells: in-house, a named supplier, or undisclosed), safety certification (critically, whether the full-assembly UL9540A fire propagation test has been passed, not just UL9540 or IEC 62619 which test cells or modules in isolation), thermal and fire mitigation architecture, AC terminal protection, and ingress protection for outdoor installation. |
| Guarantee & backbone | 0.15 | Warranty assurance (parts + labour vs parts only), manufacturer financial strength, and manufacturing track record. |
| Energy ecosystem | 0.15 | Open protocol and API maturity (Modbus TCP local vs cloud-only), VPP and FCAS grid services readiness, EV charging integration (V2H bidirectional vs OCPP smart vs none), thermal load management (SG-Ready heat pump vs relay switching vs none), smart home integration depth, grid-forming & backup tier, and firmware & security disclosure (whether the manufacturer publishes a vulnerability-disclosure policy and firmware/security documentation: scored as verifiable disclosure, not as security itself). |
Cell balancing: active vs passive
Passive balancing dissipates excess charge as heat through resistors. Active balancing moves charge between cells or modules instead of simply dissipating it. The distinction can matter over long service life, but it is often poorly disclosed. A module optimiser, pack-level control or generic BMS claim is not treated as proof of active cell-level balancing. Where exact architecture is not published, the audit row records a reviewed absence and the rubric's non-disclosure band applies.
Warranty degradation guarantee: the clause most consumers never read
An end-point-only warranty (e.g., "≥70% capacity at year 10") permits a battery to lose 25% of its capacity in year two and then stabilise. The manufacturer satisfies the warranty but the customer suffers large early losses during the years of heaviest use. A stepped guarantee adds a midterm checkpoint. A linear annual-cap guarantee limits degradation per year and prevents front-loaded decline. Only Sonnen currently offers a linear degradation guarantee in this product set. Tesla offers stepped midterm + end-of-term. All others are end-point only.
Grid-forming vs grid-following
A grid-following battery needs an external AC voltage and frequency reference to operate. It cannot function without the grid or a running generator to synchronise to. A grid-forming battery creates that reference itself: it can black-start a home from a complete outage, run indefinitely from solar, and synchronise a generator or additional solar to its own microgrid. Sonnen, Tesla Powerwall 3, and Enphase IQ Battery (with IQ System Controller) are grid-forming in this product set. Most modular batteries (BYD, LG, Sungrow SBH, Huawei Luna, LG RESU) are grid-following. Their backup capability depends entirely on the paired hybrid inverter.
Gateway disclosure: not a penalty
Some batteries require a separate gateway or hub for full smart functionality (VPP dispatch, load management, blackout protection). Where this applies, the scorecard shows an amber gateway note. Gateway dependency is not penalised in the score. A gateway mounted at the switchboard can be the correct topology when the battery is installed in a garage, shed, or any location remote from the main electrical panel. The gateway note is a disclosure so the consumer knows a separate box exists and understands its role.
Blackout protection: a standalone sub-score
Outage resilience is decision-critical for many battery buyers, but the capabilities that define it sit in three different pillars of the main rubric, so no single pillar score answered the question. Battery scorecards therefore carry a separate blackout-protection sub-score (0–100, shown with the product's rank and the fleet median). It re-weights sourced specs already scored in the main rubric around that one question: backup coverage tier, switchover continuity, surge/motor-start strength, backup power depth, and off-grid solar recharge. It is a standalone benchmark: it never feeds the overall product score, and the same missing-data rules apply (non-disclosure floors at 40; not-applicable criteria are excluded and re-normalised). The sub-rubric is published as blackout_rubric_v1 with its own change log.
Inverters
64 products across residential hybrid, small commercial, and large C&I. Seven pillars. Inverter tier pages (Residential, Small Commercial, Large C&I) apply a reweighted profile to surface the criteria most relevant to each segment.
| Pillar | Weight | What it captures |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | 0.16 | Weighted (CEC/Euro) efficiency, the primary real-world metric. Peak efficiency, semiconductor technology (SiC vs GaN vs IGBT), and night standby consumption (W drawn when not generating). |
| Design & flexibility | 0.14 | Number of independent MPPT trackers, DC:AC oversizing ratio, and maximum input current per MPPT. These determine how well the inverter handles shading, mixed orientations, and high-density panel arrays. |
| Thermal & physical resilience | 0.18 | Thermal management (fanless / smart fan / fixed fan, with audible noise implications), ingress protection rating, operating temperature range, and surge and arc (SPD) protection class. |
| Features & integration | 0.14 | Hybrid / battery capability, backup islanding quality, monitoring and smart features, and reactive power range (power factor and Q(U)/Q(P) response for grid voltage management). |
| Safety & compliance | 0.12 | Grid and safety certification (IEC 62109 international base; regional overlays noted but not penalised for international products), and shutdown / arc safety (AFCI capability and panel-level rapid shutdown). |
| Guarantee & backbone | 0.14 | Warranty period, warranty assurance (parts + labour), manufacturer financial strength, and manufacturing track record. |
| Energy ecosystem | 0.12 | Open protocol and API maturity (Modbus TCP + SunSpec vs cloud-only), VPP and FCAS readiness, EV charging integration (V2H vs OCPP vs none), thermal load management, smart home integration depth, and firmware & security disclosure (whether the manufacturer publishes a vulnerability-disclosure policy and firmware/security documentation: scored as verifiable disclosure, not as security itself). |
Semiconductor technology: why it matters
Silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) switching devices achieve lower conduction and switching losses than standard silicon IGBT, the same transition that transformed EV drivetrains. SiC excels at high-voltage C&I applications (the Fronius Argeno 125 is the first confirmed SiC residential/C&I inverter in this product set, enabling its 99.1% peak efficiency). GaN excels at the low-voltage, high-frequency switching of microinverters (Enphase IQ8). Standard silicon IGBT is mature, field-proven, and cost-effective. The 55-pt band reflects that it is the established technology, not a failing one. Products using SiC or GaN earn a technology premium that reflects genuine long-run efficiency advantages, particularly at partial load, which is where solar inverters spend most of their operating life.
Night standby consumption: the silent lifetime cost
An inverter drawing 10W during 11 non-generating hours per night consumes approximately 400 kWh over a 10-year warranty term. That is energy the household pays for but never benefits from. Fanless residential inverters typically draw 1–3W; smart-fan products 3–6W; C&I products more, though at larger system scales the percentage impact is negligible. This criterion is scored as neutral missing mode. Many manufacturers do not publish standby wattage, and absence of data is not penalised. Products that publish this figure and achieve low standby earn a legitimate competitive advantage.
Reactive power range: voltage management on the real grid
Voltage rise at the end of distribution feeders is the primary physical constraint on solar penetration in most Australian networks. Reactive power injection (Q(U) volt-VAR response) is the tool networks use to manage it. The range of that response (±0.8 pf vs ±0.9 pf, and whether the inverter also supports Q(P) active-power-dependent response) determines how much the inverter can contribute to network stability. All AU CEC-approved inverters support Q(U) response to AS/NZS 4777.2 as a minimum; the differentiation is in whether Q(P) four-quadrant response is also implemented. Huawei SUN2000 is the only confirmed four-quadrant product in this set.
What we do not score
Price
Price changes daily and varies by installer, region, and procurement volume. A score that bakes in price would be stale within weeks. Price context is provided separately where relevant but never affects a rubric score.
Bankability tier (BNEF) and module reliability rankings (PV ModuleTech)
BloombergNEF Tier 1 is a project finance construct. It reflects whether lenders will write debt against a product, not whether it outperforms in the field. PV ModuleTech publishes granular A+ to F manufacturer reliability rankings based on manufacturing quality audits and field data. Both are respected industry signals. Neither affects a score. BNEF's methodology is not publicly disclosed; incorporating an opaque external ranking into a deterministic scoring engine would undermine the transparency we require of every criterion. PV ModuleTech's rankings are proprietary, update quarterly, and would introduce a dependency on data we cannot republish. A score that changes for reasons a reader cannot independently verify is not a transparent score. Both are shown as informational context where available.
Regional availability and certification
Whether a product is available in a specific market, or carries a specific national certification (AU CEC, US UL listing), is shown in notes where known. It is not a rubric criterion. A globally certified product is not penalised on an international publication for the absence of a single national overlay.
Local installer judgement
A specification score cannot know your roof, your grid connection, or how a specific product has actually held up in your climate over years of real operation. It also cannot know an installer's own service record with a brand: the callouts, warranty claims and comparisons an experienced local installer has seen first-hand and this benchmark has no access to. That is real evidence, not a deviation from it. Where a trusted local installer recommends a product against the ranking here, on the strength of their own track record, weigh that recommendation accordingly: this benchmark measures what is published, and does not claim to replace what has actually been proven in the field.
Rubrics: panels v2.10.0, batteries v2.9.0, inverters v3.6.0 · July 2026. Maintained by Methodology & Standards, Solar Analytica.
Frequently asked
How does review.solar score solar products?
Every product is scored against a published rubric of weighted pillars, each containing criteria. Each criterion maps a measured specification to a 0–100 band. Pillar scores are weighted averages of their criteria, and the overall score out of 100 is a weighted average of pillar scores. The same arithmetic runs on every product with no editorial adjustments.
Can manufacturers pay to rank higher?
No. There is no pay-to-rank: scores are deterministic (same inputs produce the same result every time) with no human thumb on the scale, and every figure traces to a published source. No manufacturer, advertiser or retailer has any say over a score. Price, BloombergNEF bankability tier and PV ModuleTech reliability rankings are shown as context only and never affect a rubric score.
What happens when a manufacturer does not disclose a specification?
Every criterion declares a missing mode. Floor (40 points) penalises non-disclosure of a figure that should be published. Neutral (50 points) applies when an axis is not universally published in that product class, so absence is not penalised but nothing is assumed. Exclude drops the criterion and renormalises the remaining pillar weights.
Why are products not ranked on a single leaderboard?
Products are sorted into market classes, such as Premium European or Performance & Value, and judged within those classes. A boutique premium product should not be ranked against a volume residential product, so the class system prevents misleading cross-segment comparisons while still publishing all scores.
Does the score change based on regional certification or where a product is sold?
No. review.solar is an international publication that uses root international safety standards (IEC 62109 for inverters, IEC 62619 for batteries, IEC 61215/61730 for panels) as the primary certification reference. National grid-connection overlays such as Australia's AS/NZS 4777.2 and CEC, US UL 1741 or EU VDE are noted but not scored, so a globally certified product is not penalised for the absence of a single national overlay.
What is not included in a review.solar score?
Price is excluded because it changes daily by installer, region and volume. Bankability tier (BNEF) and module reliability rankings (PV ModuleTech) are excluded because their methodologies are opaque or proprietary and cannot be independently verified. Regional availability and national certifications are shown in notes but are not rubric criteria. A local installer's own track record with a product is real evidence this benchmark has no access to, and is not something a specification score can weigh.