Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Premium Performance

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass465–495 W

AIKO | AIKO-A465-MCE54Dw through AIKO-A495-MCE54Dw; scored AIKO-A495-MCE54Dw

54-cell

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-16

24.8% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Premium Performance

Comet 1N590–615 W

AIKO | AIKO-A615-MAH72Mw

72-cellMono-glassABCRear contact

78/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 79%

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

Back-Contact CellClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-ProvenPVEL Top Performer
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureNeostar 3P+54 Dual-GlassComet 1N
Architecture & Design68 / 10086 / 100
Efficiency & Yield74 / 10073 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10081 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10078 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone48 / 10064 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10080 / 100

Architecture & Design

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
68 / 100
Comet 1N
86 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
74 / 100
Comet 1N
73 / 100

Durability (verified)

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
50 / 100
Comet 1N
81 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
78 / 100
Comet 1N
78 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
48 / 100
Comet 1N
64 / 100

Sustainability

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
46 / 100
Comet 1N
80 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureNeostar 3P+54 Dual-GlassComet 1N
ArchitectureSolar moduleABC module
Published rated power range465–495 W590–615 W
Scored benchmark495 W615 W
Power495 W615 W
Efficiency24.8 % (better value on this row)23.8 %
CellNot recordedN-type ABC silicon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.26 %/°C

Architecture

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
Solar module
Comet 1N
ABC module

Published rated power range

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
465–495 W
Comet 1N
590–615 W

Scored benchmark

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
495 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Power

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
495 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Efficiency

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
24.8 % (better value on this row)
Comet 1N
23.8 %

Cell

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
Not recorded
Comet 1N
N-type ABC silicon

Temp coeff

Neostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass
-0.26 %/°C
Comet 1N
-0.26 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallComet 1N leads the global score by 15 points.
Strongest dimensionsNeostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass: Performance & Degradation · Comet 1N: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceComet 1N has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (34 points).
Evidence coverageNeostar 3P+54 Dual-Glass: strong evidence coverage (100%) · Comet 1N: strong evidence coverage (79%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Premium Performance class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.