Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell455–475 W

Astronergy | CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH 455 / 460 / 465 / 470 / 475 (96 half-cell, n-type TOPCon bifacial dual-glass)

48-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

68/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell605–640 W

Adani Solar | AB-G12R-132-605 through AB-G12R-132-640; scored model AB-G12R-132-640

66-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

60/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-02

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
Architecture & Design84 / 10068 / 100
Efficiency & Yield62 / 10063 / 100
Durability (verified)64 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation73 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone60 / 10046 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
84 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
68 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
62 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
63 / 100

Durability (verified)

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
64 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
60 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100

Sustainability

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
ArchitectureN-type TOPCon moduleN-type TOPCon module
Published rated power range455–475 W605–640 W
Scored benchmark475 W640 W
Power475 W640 W
Efficiency23.8 % (better value on this row)23.71 %
CellN-type TOPConN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)

Architecture

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
N-type TOPCon module
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon module

Published rated power range

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
605–640 W

Scored benchmark

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Power

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Efficiency

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 % (better value on this row)
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
23.71 %

Cell

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
N-type TOPCon
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell leads the global score by 8 points.
Strongest dimensionsASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell has the largest pillar edge in Architecture & Design (16 points).
Evidence coverageASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.