Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Silk Nova 144 72-cell570–590 W

FuturaSun | FU 570 MV through FU 590 MV; scored model FU 590 MV

72-cellMonofacial

55/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell605–640 W

Adani Solar | AB-G12R-132-605 through AB-G12R-132-640; scored model AB-G12R-132-640

66-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

60/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureSilk Nova 144 72-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
Architecture & Design49 / 10066 / 100
Efficiency & Yield59 / 10069 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation76 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone42 / 10046 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
49 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
66 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
59 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
69 / 100

Durability (verified)

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
50 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
76 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
42 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100

Sustainability

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
46 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureSilk Nova 144 72-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
ArchitectureSolar moduleN-type TOPCon module
Published rated power range570–590 W605–640 W
Scored benchmark590 W640 W
Power590 W640 W
Efficiency22.84 %23.71 % (better value on this row)
CellN-type monocrystallineN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)

Architecture

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
Solar module
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon module

Published rated power range

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
570–590 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
605–640 W

Scored benchmark

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
590 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Power

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
590 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Efficiency

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
22.84 %
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
23.71 % (better value on this row)

Cell

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
N-type monocrystalline
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

Silk Nova 144 72-cell
-0.29 %/°C
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell leads the global score by 5 points.
Strongest dimensionsSilk Nova 144 72-cell: Performance & Degradation · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell has the largest pillar edge in Architecture & Design (17 points).
Evidence coverageSilk Nova 144 72-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.