Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Inverter

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid6–15 kW

GoodWe | GW6000-ET-20 / GW8000-ET-20 / GW9900-ET-20 / GW12K-ET-20 / GW15K-ET-20

Three-phaseHybridEssential-load backup3 MPPTs

80/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

Fanless DesignIP66 Rated
Full scorecard
Inverter

SMILE-M-S Inverter8–9.999 kW

AlphaESS | SMILE-M8-S-INV, SMILE-M9-S-INV and SMILE-M10-S-INV; scored M10 at 9.999 kW local rating

Single-phaseHybridEssential-load backup4 MPPTs

68/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

Fanless Design
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureET G2 Three-Phase HybridSMILE-M-S Inverter
Efficiency70 / 100 (better value on this row)52 / 100
Design & Flexibility82 / 10096 / 100
Thermal & Physical Resilience90 / 10078 / 100
Features & Integration84 / 10080 / 100
Safety & Compliance87 / 10070 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone80 / 10054 / 100
Energy Ecosystem64 / 10040 / 100

Efficiency

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
70 / 100 (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
52 / 100

Design & Flexibility

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
82 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
96 / 100

Thermal & Physical Resilience

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
90 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
78 / 100

Features & Integration

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
84 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
80 / 100

Safety & Compliance

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
87 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
70 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
80 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
54 / 100

Energy Ecosystem

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
64 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
40 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureET G2 Three-Phase HybridSMILE-M-S Inverter
ArchitectureHybrid inverterHybrid inverter
Published rated AC power range6–15 kW8–9.999 kW
Scored benchmark15 kW9.999 kW
Power15.0 kW9.999 kW
TypeHybridHybrid
Peak eff98.2 % (better value on this row)97.47 %
MPPTs34 (better value on this row)

Architecture

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
Hybrid inverter
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid inverter

Published rated AC power range

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
6–15 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
8–9.999 kW

Scored benchmark

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
15 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Power

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
15.0 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Type

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
Hybrid
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid

Peak eff

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
98.2 % (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
97.47 %

MPPTs

ET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid
3
SMILE-M-S Inverter
4 (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid leads the global score by 12 points.
Strongest dimensionsET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid: Thermal & Physical Resilience · SMILE-M-S Inverter: Design & Flexibility
Largest differenceET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (26 points).
Evidence coverageET G2 Three-Phase Hybrid: strong evidence coverage (100%) · SMILE-M-S Inverter: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Inverter class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.