Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG

Qcells

77/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 72%

Evidence checked 2026-07-16

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenPVEL Top PerformerBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFGASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design81 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield71 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)76 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation77 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone70 / 10053 / 100
Sustainability100 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
81 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
71 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
76 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
77 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
70 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
53 / 100

Sustainability

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
100 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFGASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range620–645 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark645 W475 W
Power645 W475 W
Efficiency23.1 %23.8 %
CellTOPConTOPCon
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
620–645 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
645 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
645 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
23.1 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
TOPCon
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
TOPCon

Temp coeff

Q.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG
-0.29 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG leads the global score by 14 points.
Strongest dimensionsQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG: Sustainability · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (54 points).
Evidence coverageQ.TRON XL-G2.3/BFG: strong evidence coverage (72%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.