Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell

HD Hyundai

56/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-02

Heterojunction (HJT)Class-Leading Temp CoeffBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

64/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-02

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureHeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design74 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield76 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation40 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone40 / 10060 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
74 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
76 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
50 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
40 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
40 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
60 / 100

Sustainability

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
46 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureHeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range440–465 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark465 W475 W
Power465 W475 W
Efficiency23.3 %23.8 %
CellHeterojunction (HJT)N-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.24 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
440–465 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
465 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
465 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
23.3 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
Heterojunction (HJT)
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

HeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell
-0.24 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell leads the global score by 8 points.
Strongest dimensionsHeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell: Efficiency & Yield · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell has the largest pillar edge in Performance & Degradation (33 points).
Evidence coverageHeteroMax CE-BF(ZB) 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.