Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Inverter

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH5–6 kW

iStore | IS-HYB-5000-3PH / IS-HYB-6000-3PH

Three-phaseHybridEssential-load backup2 MPPTs

74/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-30

Fanless DesignAFCI Integrated
Full scorecard
Inverter

SMILE-M-S Inverter8–9.999 kW

AlphaESS | SMILE-M8-S-INV, SMILE-M9-S-INV and SMILE-M10-S-INV; scored M10 at 9.999 kW local rating

Single-phaseHybridEssential-load backup4 MPPTs

68/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

Fanless Design
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureHybrid 5000/6000 3PHSMILE-M-S Inverter
Efficiency71 / 100 (better value on this row)52 / 100
Design & Flexibility76 / 10096 / 100
Thermal & Physical Resilience85 / 10078 / 100
Features & Integration84 / 10080 / 100
Safety & Compliance95 / 10070 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone58 / 10054 / 100
Energy Ecosystem48 / 10040 / 100

Efficiency

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
71 / 100 (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
52 / 100

Design & Flexibility

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
76 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
96 / 100

Thermal & Physical Resilience

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
85 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
78 / 100

Features & Integration

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
84 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
80 / 100

Safety & Compliance

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
95 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
70 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
58 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
54 / 100

Energy Ecosystem

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
48 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
40 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureHybrid 5000/6000 3PHSMILE-M-S Inverter
ArchitectureHybrid inverterHybrid inverter
Published rated AC power range5–6 kW8–9.999 kW
Scored benchmark6 kW9.999 kW
Power6.0 kW9.999 kW
TypeHybridHybrid
Peak eff98.4 % (better value on this row)97.47 %
MPPTs24 (better value on this row)

Architecture

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
Hybrid inverter
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid inverter

Published rated AC power range

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
5–6 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
8–9.999 kW

Scored benchmark

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
6 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Power

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
6.0 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Type

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
Hybrid
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid

Peak eff

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
98.4 % (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
97.47 %

MPPTs

Hybrid 5000/6000 3PH
2
SMILE-M-S Inverter
4 (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallHybrid 5000/6000 3PH leads the global score by 6 points.
Strongest dimensionsHybrid 5000/6000 3PH: Safety & Compliance · SMILE-M-S Inverter: Design & Flexibility
Largest differenceHybrid 5000/6000 3PH has the largest pillar edge in Safety & Compliance (25 points).
Evidence coverageHybrid 5000/6000 3PH: strong evidence coverage (100%) · SMILE-M-S Inverter: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Inverter class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.