Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Premium Performance

Hi-MO 9 72HYD645–660 W

LONGi | LR7-72HYD-625M through LR7-72HYD-660M (144-cell 6 by 24, HPBC rear-contact, bifacial dual-glass); scored model LR7-72HYD-660M

72-cellBifacialDual-glassHPBC

70/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

Back-Contact Cell24.4% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-Proven
Full scorecard
Premium Performance

Comet 1N590–615 W

AIKO | AIKO-A615-MAH72Mw

72-cellMono-glassABCRear contact

73/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-05

Back-Contact CellClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-ProvenInsured Warranty
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureHi-MO 9 72HYDComet 1N
Architecture & Design90 / 10088 / 100
Efficiency & Yield65 / 10063 / 100
Durability (verified)52 / 10066 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10078 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone58 / 10064 / 100
Sustainability91 / 10080 / 100

Architecture & Design

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
90 / 100
Comet 1N
88 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
65 / 100
Comet 1N
63 / 100

Durability (verified)

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
52 / 100
Comet 1N
66 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
78 / 100
Comet 1N
78 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
58 / 100
Comet 1N
64 / 100

Sustainability

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
91 / 100
Comet 1N
80 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureHi-MO 9 72HYDComet 1N
ArchitectureHPBC moduleABC module
Published rated power range645–660 W590–615 W
Scored benchmark660 W615 W
Power660 W615 W
Efficiency24.4 % (better value on this row)23.8 %
CellHPBCN-type ABC silicon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.26 %/°C

Architecture

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
HPBC module
Comet 1N
ABC module

Published rated power range

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
645–660 W
Comet 1N
590–615 W

Scored benchmark

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
660 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Power

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
660 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Efficiency

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
24.4 % (better value on this row)
Comet 1N
23.8 %

Cell

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
HPBC
Comet 1N
N-type ABC silicon

Temp coeff

Hi-MO 9 72HYD
-0.26 %/°C
Comet 1N
-0.26 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallComet 1N leads the global score by 3 points.
Strongest dimensionsHi-MO 9 72HYD: Sustainability · Comet 1N: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceComet 1N has the largest pillar edge in Durability (verified) (14 points).
Evidence coverageHi-MO 9 72HYD: strong evidence coverage (100%) · Comet 1N: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Premium Performance class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.