Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH

LONGi

75/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 69%

Evidence checked 2026-07-14

Back-Contact Cell24.0% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-Proven
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVHASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design79 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield83 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)70 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone64 / 10053 / 100
Sustainability72 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
79 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
83 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
70 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
78 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
64 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
53 / 100

Sustainability

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
72 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVHASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range475–490 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark490 W475 W
Power490 W475 W
Efficiency24.0 %23.8 %
CellBack-contact hybTOPCon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
475–490 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
490 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
490 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
24.0 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
Back-contact hyb
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
TOPCon

Temp coeff

Hi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH
-0.26 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH leads the global score by 12 points.
Strongest dimensionsHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH: Efficiency & Yield · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (26 points).
Evidence coverageHi-MO X10 Explorer 54HVH: strong evidence coverage (69%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.