Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Emerging Technology

Centaur 2LT510–540 W

Oxford PV | Centaur 2LT 540

Perovskite-silicon tandem

54/ 100

Average

Strong evidence coverage · 93%

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

25.0% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp Coeff
Full scorecard
Emerging Technology

Copper HJT

SunDrive | Cu-HJT (pre-commercial)

HJT

43/ 100

Below Avg Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

Heterojunction (HJT)
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureCentaur 2LTCopper HJT
Architecture & Design64 / 10057 / 100
Efficiency & Yield81 / 10040 / 100
Durability (verified)42 / 10040 / 100
Performance & Degradation40 / 10040 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone40 / 10039 / 100
Sustainability52 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Centaur 2LT
64 / 100
Copper HJT
57 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Centaur 2LT
81 / 100
Copper HJT
40 / 100

Durability (verified)

Centaur 2LT
42 / 100
Copper HJT
40 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Centaur 2LT
40 / 100
Copper HJT
40 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Centaur 2LT
40 / 100
Copper HJT
39 / 100

Sustainability

Centaur 2LT
52 / 100
Copper HJT
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureCentaur 2LTCopper HJT
ArchitecturePerovskite-silicon tandem moduleHJT module
Published rated power range510–540 WNot stated
Scored benchmark540 WNot stated
Power540 WNot recorded
Efficiency25.0 %Not recorded
CellPerovskite-silicon tandeHeterojunction (HJT)
Temp coeff-0.21 %/°CNot recorded

Architecture

Centaur 2LT
Perovskite-silicon tandem module
Copper HJT
HJT module

Published rated power range

Centaur 2LT
510–540 W
Copper HJT
Not stated

Scored benchmark

Centaur 2LT
540 W
Copper HJT
Not stated

Power

Centaur 2LT
540 W
Copper HJT
Not recorded

Efficiency

Centaur 2LT
25.0 %
Copper HJT
Not recorded

Cell

Centaur 2LT
Perovskite-silicon tande
Copper HJT
Heterojunction (HJT)

Temp coeff

Centaur 2LT
-0.21 %/°C
Copper HJT
Not recorded
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallCentaur 2LT leads the global score by 11 points.
Strongest dimensionsCentaur 2LT: Efficiency & Yield · Copper HJT: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceCentaur 2LT has the largest pillar edge in Efficiency & Yield (41 points).
Evidence coverageCentaur 2LT: strong evidence coverage (93%) · Copper HJT: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Emerging Technology class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.