Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Quasar 108-cell

Phono Solar

66/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

Back-Contact Cell24.25% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffBifacial
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureQuasar 108-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design88 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield73 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)52 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone41 / 10053 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Quasar 108-cell
88 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Quasar 108-cell
73 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

Quasar 108-cell
52 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Quasar 108-cell
78 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Quasar 108-cell
41 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
53 / 100

Sustainability

Quasar 108-cell
46 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureQuasar 108-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range475–495 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark495 W475 W
Power495 W475 W
Efficiency24.25 %23.8 %
CellBack-contactTOPCon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

Quasar 108-cell
475–495 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

Quasar 108-cell
495 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

Quasar 108-cell
495 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

Quasar 108-cell
24.25 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

Quasar 108-cell
Back-contact
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
TOPCon

Temp coeff

Quasar 108-cell
-0.26 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallQuasar 108-cell leads the global score by 3 points.
Strongest dimensionsQuasar 108-cell: Architecture & Design · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (12 points).
Evidence coverageQuasar 108-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.