Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell

Risen

67/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

Heterojunction (HJT)24.0% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffBifacial
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureHyper-ion Pro 66-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design80 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield83 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation81 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone41 / 10053 / 100
Sustainability48 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
80 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
83 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
50 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
81 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
41 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
53 / 100

Sustainability

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
48 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureHyper-ion Pro 66-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range720–745 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark745 W475 W
Power745 W475 W
Efficiency24.0 %23.8 %
CellHeterojunctionTOPCon
Temp coeff-0.24 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
720–745 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
745 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
745 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
24.0 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
Heterojunction
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
TOPCon

Temp coeff

Hyper-ion Pro 66-cell
-0.24 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallHyper-ion Pro 66-cell leads the global score by 4 points.
Strongest dimensionsHyper-ion Pro 66-cell: Efficiency & Yield · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceHyper-ion Pro 66-cell has the largest pillar edge in Efficiency & Yield (16 points).
Evidence coverageHyper-ion Pro 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.