Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

RSM108-11 54-cell

Risen

67/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-02

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

64/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-02

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureRSM108-11 54-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design75 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield71 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)51 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation73 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone73 / 10060 / 100
Sustainability52 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

RSM108-11 54-cell
75 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

RSM108-11 54-cell
71 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

RSM108-11 54-cell
51 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

RSM108-11 54-cell
73 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

RSM108-11 54-cell
73 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
60 / 100

Sustainability

RSM108-11 54-cell
52 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureRSM108-11 54-cellASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range490–515 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark515 W475 W
Power515 W475 W
Efficiency23.2 %23.8 %
CellN-type TOPConN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

RSM108-11 54-cell
490–515 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

RSM108-11 54-cell
515 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

RSM108-11 54-cell
515 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

RSM108-11 54-cell
23.2 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

RSM108-11 54-cell
N-type TOPCon
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

RSM108-11 54-cell
-0.29 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallRSM108-11 54-cell leads the global score by 3 points.
Strongest dimensionsRSM108-11 54-cell: Architecture & Design · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceRSM108-11 54-cell has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (13 points).
Evidence coverageRSM108-11 54-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.