Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Specialist & Local

Panel vision

Solarwatt

71/ 100

Very good

Limited evidence coverage · 32%

Evidence checked 2026-07-16

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Specialist & Local

Glass

Meyer Burger

71/ 100

Very good

Limited evidence coverage · 29%

Evidence checked 2026-07-16

Heterojunction (HJT)Class-Leading Temp CoeffBifacialGlass-GlassFinancial note
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasurePanel visionGlass
Architecture & Design77 / 10083 / 100
Efficiency & Yield61 / 10062 / 100
Durability (verified)56 / 10059 / 100
Performance & Degradation79 / 10089 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone89 / 10062 / 100
Sustainability72 / 10072 / 100

Architecture & Design

Panel vision
77 / 100
Glass
83 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Panel vision
61 / 100
Glass
62 / 100

Durability (verified)

Panel vision
56 / 100
Glass
59 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Panel vision
79 / 100
Glass
89 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Panel vision
89 / 100
Glass
62 / 100

Sustainability

Panel vision
72 / 100
Glass
72 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasurePanel visionGlass
Published rated power range420–435 W370–390 W
Scored benchmark435 W390 W
Power435 W390 W
Efficiency22.3 %21.8 %
CellTOPConHeterojunction
Temp coeff-0.3 %/°C-0.26 %/°C

Published rated power range

Panel vision
420–435 W
Glass
370–390 W

Scored benchmark

Panel vision
435 W
Glass
390 W

Power

Panel vision
435 W
Glass
390 W

Efficiency

Panel vision
22.3 %
Glass
21.8 %

Cell

Panel vision
TOPCon
Glass
Heterojunction

Temp coeff

Panel vision
-0.3 %/°C
Glass
-0.26 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallThe products are tied at 71.
Strongest dimensionsPanel vision: Guarantee & Backbone · Glass: Performance & Degradation
Largest differencePanel vision has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (27 points).
Evidence coveragePanel vision: limited evidence coverage (32%) · Glass: limited evidence coverage (29%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Specialist & Local class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.