Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell470–485 W

Suntech | STP-NT11/48QGSF-470, -475, -480 and -485; scored 485 W monofacial model

48-cellN-type TOPConDual-glassMonofacial

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-27

24.3% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell605–640 W

Adani Solar | AB-G12R-132-605 through AB-G12R-132-640; scored model AB-G12R-132-640

66-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

60/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
Architecture & Design68 / 10068 / 100
Efficiency & Yield66 / 10065 / 100
Durability (verified)48 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone62 / 10046 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
68 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
68 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
66 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
65 / 100

Durability (verified)

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
48 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
78 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
62 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100

Sustainability

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
46 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cellELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
ArchitectureN-type TOPCon moduleN-type TOPCon module
Published rated power range470–485 W605–640 W
Scored benchmark485 W640 W
Power485 W640 W
Efficiency24.3 % (better value on this row)23.71 %
CellN-type TOPConN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C (better value on this row)-0.28 %/°C

Architecture

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
N-type TOPCon module
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon module

Published rated power range

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
470–485 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
605–640 W

Scored benchmark

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
485 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Power

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
485 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Efficiency

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
24.3 % (better value on this row)
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
23.71 %

Cell

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
N-type TOPCon
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

Ultra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell
-0.26 %/°C (better value on this row)
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
-0.28 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell leads the global score by 3 points.
Strongest dimensionsUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell: Performance & Degradation · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (16 points).
Evidence coverageUltra T 3.0 48QGSF 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.