Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Emerging Technology

Tandem module

Tandem PV | Full-size tandem (target)

Perovskite-silicon tandem

45/ 100

Average

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-22

Full scorecard
Emerging Technology

Centaur 2LT510–540 W

Oxford PV | Centaur 2LT 540

Perovskite-silicon tandem

54/ 100

Average

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-20

25.0% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureTandem moduleCentaur 2LT
Architecture & Design64 / 10081 / 100
Efficiency & Yield42 / 10064 / 100
Durability (verified)40 / 10043 / 100
Performance & Degradation40 / 10040 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone39 / 10040 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10052 / 100

Architecture & Design

Tandem module
64 / 100
Centaur 2LT
81 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Tandem module
42 / 100
Centaur 2LT
64 / 100

Durability (verified)

Tandem module
40 / 100
Centaur 2LT
43 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Tandem module
40 / 100
Centaur 2LT
40 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Tandem module
39 / 100
Centaur 2LT
40 / 100

Sustainability

Tandem module
46 / 100
Centaur 2LT
52 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureTandem moduleCentaur 2LT
ArchitecturePerovskite-silicon tandem modulePerovskite-silicon tandem module
PowerNot recorded540 W
EfficiencyNot recorded25.0 %
CellPerovskite-silicon tandePerovskite-silicon tande
Temp coeffNot recorded-0.21 %/°C
Published rated power rangeNot stated510–540 W
Scored benchmarkNot stated540 W

Architecture

Tandem module
Perovskite-silicon tandem module
Centaur 2LT
Perovskite-silicon tandem module

Power

Tandem module
Not recorded
Centaur 2LT
540 W

Efficiency

Tandem module
Not recorded
Centaur 2LT
25.0 %

Cell

Tandem module
Perovskite-silicon tande
Centaur 2LT
Perovskite-silicon tande

Temp coeff

Tandem module
Not recorded
Centaur 2LT
-0.21 %/°C

Published rated power range

Tandem module
Not stated
Centaur 2LT
510–540 W

Scored benchmark

Tandem module
Not stated
Centaur 2LT
540 W
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallCentaur 2LT leads the global score by 9 points.
Strongest dimensionsTandem module: Architecture & Design · Centaur 2LT: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceCentaur 2LT has the largest pillar edge in Efficiency & Yield (22 points).
Evidence coverageTandem module: strong evidence coverage (100%) · Centaur 2LT: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Emerging Technology class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.