Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

PANDA 3.0 Pro575–600 W

Yingli | YL575CF72 e/2 through YL600CF72 e/2; 144 half-cells / 72-cell format; scored model YL600CF72 e/2

72-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

59/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell605–640 W

Adani Solar | AB-G12R-132-605 through AB-G12R-132-640; scored model AB-G12R-132-640

66-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

60/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-06

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasurePANDA 3.0 ProELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
Architecture & Design54 / 10066 / 100
Efficiency & Yield72 / 10069 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation73 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone46 / 10046 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

PANDA 3.0 Pro
54 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
66 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

PANDA 3.0 Pro
72 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
69 / 100

Durability (verified)

PANDA 3.0 Pro
50 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

PANDA 3.0 Pro
73 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

PANDA 3.0 Pro
46 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100

Sustainability

PANDA 3.0 Pro
46 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasurePANDA 3.0 ProELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
ArchitectureN-type TOPCon moduleN-type TOPCon module
Published rated power range575–600 W605–640 W
Scored benchmark600 W640 W
Power600 W640 W
Efficiency23.2 %23.71 % (better value on this row)
CellN-type TOPConN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)

Architecture

PANDA 3.0 Pro
N-type TOPCon module
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon module

Published rated power range

PANDA 3.0 Pro
575–600 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
605–640 W

Scored benchmark

PANDA 3.0 Pro
600 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Power

PANDA 3.0 Pro
600 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Efficiency

PANDA 3.0 Pro
23.2 %
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
23.71 % (better value on this row)

Cell

PANDA 3.0 Pro
N-type TOPCon
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

PANDA 3.0 Pro
-0.29 %/°C
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
-0.28 %/°C (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell leads the global score by 1 point.
Strongest dimensionsPANDA 3.0 Pro: Performance & Degradation · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell has the largest pillar edge in Architecture & Design (12 points).
Evidence coveragePANDA 3.0 Pro: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.