Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Premium Performance

JGDN132710–740 W

Golden Solar | JGDN132-710 through JGDN132-740 (132 half-cut cells, N-type HJT, bifacial double glass); scored model JGDN132-740

BifacialDual-glass

64/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-18

Class-Leading Temp CoeffGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Premium Performance

Comet 1N590–615 W

AIKO | AIKO-A615-MAH72Mw

72-cellMono-glassABCRear contact

78/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 81%

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

Back-Contact CellClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-ProvenPVEL Top Performer
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureJGDN132Comet 1N
Architecture & Design77 / 10088 / 100
Efficiency & Yield72 / 10073 / 100
Durability (verified)50 / 10081 / 100
Performance & Degradation81 / 10078 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone41 / 10064 / 100
Sustainability46 / 10080 / 100

Architecture & Design

JGDN132
77 / 100
Comet 1N
88 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

JGDN132
72 / 100
Comet 1N
73 / 100

Durability (verified)

JGDN132
50 / 100
Comet 1N
81 / 100

Performance & Degradation

JGDN132
81 / 100
Comet 1N
78 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

JGDN132
41 / 100
Comet 1N
64 / 100

Sustainability

JGDN132
46 / 100
Comet 1N
80 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureJGDN132Comet 1N
ArchitectureSolar moduleABC module
Published rated power range710–740 W590–615 W
Scored benchmark740 W615 W
Power740 W615 W
Efficiency23.82 % (better value on this row)23.8 %
CellN-type HJTN-type ABC silicon
Temp coeff-0.254 %/°C (better value on this row)-0.26 %/°C

Architecture

JGDN132
Solar module
Comet 1N
ABC module

Published rated power range

JGDN132
710–740 W
Comet 1N
590–615 W

Scored benchmark

JGDN132
740 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Power

JGDN132
740 W
Comet 1N
615 W

Efficiency

JGDN132
23.82 % (better value on this row)
Comet 1N
23.8 %

Cell

JGDN132
N-type HJT
Comet 1N
N-type ABC silicon

Temp coeff

JGDN132
-0.254 %/°C (better value on this row)
Comet 1N
-0.26 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallComet 1N leads the global score by 14 points.
Strongest dimensionsJGDN132: Performance & Degradation · Comet 1N: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceComet 1N has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (34 points).
Evidence coverageJGDN132: strong evidence coverage (100%) · Comet 1N: strong evidence coverage (81%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Premium Performance class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.