The assessment
How it scores, by category
Market position
The data
Solar module
Produces DC electricity at the roof. It contains no system-level power conversion or storage.
- Product role
- None in the module.
- Published range
- 710–740 W
- Electrical layer
- DC module output
- Construction
- Bifacial, Dual-glass
Performance guarantee: 30-year linear output
Wattage figure based on the sourced rated power (740 W) applied to the guaranteed floor; modular/format differences aside, this is the same rated-power spec shown above.
Modelled effective output, year by year
Year 1 to year 25, at 30°C and 1000 W/m². Rated 740 W at STC.
How this is modelled
Compounds this panel’s own published first-year (1%) and annual (0.3%/yr) degradation figures against its 740 W rated (STC) output, then derates for the ambient and irradiance selected. Output is scaled roughly linearly with irradiance (1000W/m² against the 1000 W/m² STC reference). This is the dominant real-world effect at low light, whether from cloud, shading or soiling. Output is then further derated for heat, from this panel’s own NOCT (43°C) and temperature coefficient (-0.254%/°C), giving an estimated cell temperature of 59°C at that ambient and irradiance. A datasheet-derived estimate, not a field measurement or a warranty guarantee: it does not account for this panel’s own low-light efficiency response (a separate, less-consistently-published spec), or for wind and system design. See NOCT and temperature coefficient in the glossary.
Control panel
| Year | 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watts | 670 W | 662 W | 652 W | 641 W | 631 W | 621 W |
| % of rated | 90.5% | 89.4% | 88.0% | 86.7% | 85.3% | 83.9% |
Verification & sources
Market context
Global evidencechange in the site menu
Global benchmark. This scorecard is benchmarked globally. A global score does not imply local availability, certification, warranty coverage, or installer compatibility.
Benchmark anchor. The score uses the highest published power bin in the series. The Australian approved-module list carries zero Golden Solar rows, so no market-scoped range is published. Scored model: JGDN132-740 · checked 2026-08-18. Evidence.
Sources & references · checked 2026-08-18
Strong evidence coverage
14 of 14 scored criteria link directly to a published source.
Values marked estimated, derived, or not found remain visible on the audit sheet and do not carry the same evidential weight as a linked source. Coverage measures direct links, not an independent guarantee that a claim is correct.
Record revision. Built 2026-08-18 from Golden Solar's Chinese-language JGDN132 datasheet, version marked 组件参数 V1.1_CN. Read from a render: the text layer emits the three temperature coefficients out of label order and will mislead a parse that trusts sequence. Cell type is given verbatim as HJT132 half-cut, N-type monocrystalline. Sourcing hazard recorded: the cover page carries a marketing bullet reading bifaciality up to 95%, and the mechanical table carries NO bifaciality row at all, so no bifaciality value is recorded here. Two independent research passes reported that 95% as a specification; it is not one. Domain caution: the company website printed on the datasheet is goldensolarcorp.com; the legacy goldenglass.com.cn is NXDOMAIN and now resolves to an unrelated firm, so any citation pointing there is poisoned.
- Sourced valuesData card →
- Archived copy of the primary sourcePDF ↗
Product record history
Baseline 2026-08-16 · 232 product records
Product record
kind: panel; brand: Golden Solar; name: JGDN132; model: JGDN132-710 through JGDN132-740 (132 half-cut cells, N-type HJT, bifacial double glass); scored model JGDN132-740; score: 63.5
Source
This is review.solar's publication history. It does not claim the product changed on the recorded date, and it excludes compatibility, system pairing, installation suitability and relative leaderboard prose. Open the complete JSON record.
Evidence timeline
Recorded verification events for this scorecard. These are evidence checks, not historical score snapshots.
- Core scorecard evidence checked
- Series benchmark evidence checked
Scored by Solar Analytica Research
Stay across the benchmark.
New scorecards, score changes and market signals, published as they happen.
Our reading
JGDN132 scores 64, placing 46 of 47 in the Premium Performance class against a class average of 69.4. Its strongest scoring dimension is performance & degradation (81), above the class average of 78. Guarantee & Backbone scores 41, the lowest pillar for this product. The class average on guarantee & backbone is 55. Underlying specifications include a module efficiency of 23.82%, N-type HJT cell technology, 15-year product warranty backed by a 30-year performance term.