Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV

Jinko Solar

77/ 100

Superior

Strong evidence coverage · 63%

Evidence checked 2026-06-16

24.8% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp Coeff15+ Yrs Field-ProvenPVEL Top Performer
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell

Astronergy

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-07-31

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDVASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Architecture & Design78 / 10078 / 100
Efficiency & Yield86 / 10067 / 100
Durability (verified)74 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation73 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone62 / 10053 / 100
Sustainability100 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
78 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
78 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
86 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
67 / 100

Durability (verified)

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
74 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
73 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
62 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
53 / 100

Sustainability

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
100 / 100
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

MeasureTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDVASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
Published rated power range650–670 W455–475 W
Scored benchmark670 W475 W
Power670 W475 W
Efficiency24.8 %23.8 %
CellTOPConTOPCon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C-0.29 %/°C

Published rated power range

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
650–670 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
455–475 W

Scored benchmark

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
670 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Power

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
670 W
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
475 W

Efficiency

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
24.8 %
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
23.8 %

Cell

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
TOPCon
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
TOPCon

Temp coeff

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV
-0.26 %/°C
ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell
-0.29 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV leads the global score by 14 points.
Strongest dimensionsTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV: Sustainability · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: Architecture & Design
Largest differenceTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (54 points).
Evidence coverageTiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV: strong evidence coverage (63%) · ASTRO N7s 2.0 48-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.