Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV

US Status

Before

not_reviewed

After

unavailable

US Support Note

Current text

jinkosolar.us/download-center/ is the official United States host. Live retrieval from this environment returns HTTP 403. Trace Research adjudication is the research lock: exact Tiger Neo code JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV is absent; the published US catalogue is EAGLE only. Nearby Eagle SKUs are not transferred. A global or EU sheet is not a United States sale path.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

US Evidence sources

Before

https://jinkosolar.us/; https://jinkosolar.us/eagle-modules/

After

https://jinkosolar.us/; https://jinkosolar.us/download-center/; https://jinkosolar.us/eagle-modules/

DE Certifications

Before

Not previously recorded

After

US Certifications

Before

Not previously recorded

After

US Support Note

Before

Not previously recorded

After

jinkosolar.us and jinkosolar.us/eagle-modules/ return HTTP 403 Cloudflare challenges from this review environment. No usable United States catalogue was retrieved for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU / Tiger Neo III 3.0. This is an access barrier, not a finding of unavailability. A global jinkosolar.com page is not a United States sale path.

DE Evidence sources

Before

Not previously recorded

After

https://jinkosolar.de/; https://jinkosolar.eu/

DE Support Note

Before

Not previously recorded

After

jinkosolar.eu now returns HTTP 403 via BunnyCDN. jinkosolar.de fails TLS. No usable German catalogue was retrieved for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU. Prior EU PDFs on this record are not treated as a current German sale path.

US Status

Before

Not previously recorded

After

not_reviewed

Source revision

Current text

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV exact sheet, current CEC identity and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20251210 rechecked 2026-08-23; salt, ammonia and service coverage corrected. Official Australian due-soon freshness recheck 2026-08-29. Australian warranty-terms recovery 2026-08-29: structured AU overlay terms recovered or held from the exact governing instrument. First-market US and DE overlay review 2026-09-01: official regional catalogues recorded; Australian overlays and scores unchanged.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

DE Status

Before

Not previously recorded

After

not_reviewed

US Evidence sources

Before

Not previously recorded

After

https://jinkosolar.us/; https://jinkosolar.us/eagle-modules/

Efficiency & Yield pillar score

Before

71.5

After

68

Global score

Before

74.6

After

73.9

Source revision

Current text

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV exact sheet, current CEC identity and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20251210 rechecked 2026-08-23; salt, ammonia and service coverage corrected. Official Australian due-soon freshness recheck 2026-08-29. Australian warranty-terms recovery 2026-08-29: structured AU overlay terms recovered or held from the exact governing instrument.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

AU Evidence sources

Before

https://cer.gov.au/document/cec-approved-pv-modules-0; https://jinkosolar.com.au/download_categories/datasheets/; https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-OC-FF.pdf; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

After

https://cer.gov.au/document/cec-approved-pv-modules-0; https://jinkosolar.com.au/download_categories/datasheets/; https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/LIMITED-WARRANTY-REV.AU20251210-LINEAR-BIFACIAL-MODULE.pdf; https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-OC-FF.pdf; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

AU Warranty conditions

Before

Not previously recorded

After

labour: Customer inspection, diagnosis, removal and reinstallation costs are excluded.; registration: No pre-registration is stated; written notice and the specified purchase, serial, site and defect evidence are required after discovery.; remedy: At Jinko's choice: repair, replacement, additional modules, residual-value refund or payment for the warranted output shortfall.; removal reinstallation: Dismantling, repacking, installation and reinstallation remain customer costs.; transferability: The warranty may be assigned after written notice, full payment and any assignment agreement reasonably requested by Jinko.; transport: Jinko bears shipping for its selected replacement, repair or additional-module remedy and for modules it elects to retrieve.

AU Warranty scope

Before

Not previously recorded

After

Australia and New Zealand; LIMITED WARRANTY REV.AU20251210 LINEAR BIFACIAL MODULE names JKMxxxN-66QL6-BDV with a 12-year product term and a 30-year power term, and applies to purchase agreements on or after 10 December 2025.

Source revision

Before

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV exact sheet, current CEC identity and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20251210 rechecked 2026-08-23; salt, ammonia and service coverage corrected.

After

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV exact sheet, current CEC identity and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20251210 rechecked 2026-08-23; salt, ammonia and service coverage corrected. Official Australian due-soon freshness recheck 2026-08-29.

Source

Current text

checked: 2026-08-29; source revision: JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU sheet, AU library sheet and current CER IEC 61215-2021 row, rechecked 2026-08-29; source url: https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

AU Support Note

Before

Jinko Solar Australia's datasheet library publishes the exact JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4 Tiger Neo III family, including the benchmarked 670 W power class.

After

Jinko Solar Australia's datasheet library still publishes the JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4 family, including a June 2026 Australian sheet. Scored specifications remain those of the exact EU F4-EU sheet already on this record. The Australian sheet is additional publication evidence, not a silent specification replacement.

AU Evidence sources

Before

https://jinkosolar.com.au/download_categories/datasheets/

After

https://cer.gov.au/document/cec-approved-pv-modules-0; https://jinkosolar.com.au/download_categories/datasheets/; https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-OC-FF.pdf; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

AU Certifications

Before

After

The 29 August 2026 CER module export lists current row JKM670N-66QL6-BDV (IEC 61215-2021), approved 27 October 2025 and expiring 27 October 2028.

Ranges

Current text

checked: 2026-08-29; market: global; max: 670; min: 650; range label: 650–670 W; source revision: JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU sheet, AU library sheet and current CER IEC 61215-2021 row, rechecked 2026-08-29; source url: https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf; unit: W

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Independent energy yield: Evidence sources

Before

https://ir.jinkosolar.com/news-releases/news-release-details/jinkosolar-recognized-top-performer-pvels-pv-module-1

After

https://scorecard.pvel.com/methodology/; https://scorecard.pvel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-PVEL-PV-Module-Reliability-Scorecard-Summary.pdf

Durability (verified) pillar score

Before

57

After

63.3

Salt mist (IEC 61701): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Ammonia resistance (IEC 62716): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Guarantee & Backbone pillar score

Before

65.6

After

68

Bifaciality factor (%): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

PID (IEC TS 62804): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Global score

Before

72.8

After

74.6

Source revision

Before

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly. Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded from the datasheet's own "superior resistance to PID, LID / LeTID" statement, previously logged as not stated. Manufacturer claim, no test cited. No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance. Re-verification 2026-08-19: Verified reliability recorded as "Brand or series independently tested; exact model not covered" under panel rubric v2.13.0, which added a band for brand or series evidence where the exact model is not covered by the third-party record. Re-verification 2026-08-20: Independent energy yield recorded as brand-or-series under panel rubric v2.14.0, which applied to this criterion the same exact-model rule v2.13.0 applied to Verified reliability.

After

Tiger Neo III 66QL6-BDV exact sheet, current CEC identity and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20251210 rechecked 2026-08-23; salt, ammonia and service coverage corrected.

Ammonia resistance (IEC 62716): Evidence status

Before

derived

After

sourced

Fire classification (IEC 61730): Evidence sources

Before

After

https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/industry-programs/products-program/modules; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Guarantee assurance: Evidence sources

Before

After

https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/LIMITED-WARRANTY-REV.AU20251210-LINEAR-BIFACIAL-MODULE.pdf; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Guarantee assurance

Before

Parts only

After

Parts & Service

Ammonia resistance (IEC 62716)

Before

Not listed

After

IEC 62716 certified

Salt mist (IEC 61701)

Before

Not Listed

After

Certified (IEC 61701), severity not published

Source revision

Current text

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly. Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded from the datasheet's own "superior resistance to PID, LID / LeTID" statement, previously logged as not stated. Manufacturer claim, no test cited. No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance. Re-verification 2026-08-19: Verified reliability recorded as "Brand or series independently tested; exact model not covered" under panel rubric v2.13.0, which added a band for brand or series evidence where the exact model is not covered by the third-party record. Re-verification 2026-08-20: Independent energy yield recorded as brand-or-series under panel rubric v2.14.0, which applied to this criterion the same exact-model rule v2.13.0 applied to Verified reliability.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Independent energy yield

Before

Field/PAN energy-yield Top Performer

After

Brand or series yield-tested; exact model not covered

Name Rating

Before

Superior

After

Very Good

Global score

Before

75.3

After

72.8

Rating

Before

Superior

After

Very good

Durability (verified) pillar score

Before

57.5

After

57

Efficiency & Yield pillar score

Before

83.4

After

71.5

Source revision

Current text

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly. Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded from the datasheet's own "superior resistance to PID, LID / LeTID" statement, previously logged as not stated. Manufacturer claim, no test cited. No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance. Re-verification 2026-08-19: Verified reliability recorded as "Brand or series independently tested; exact model not covered" under panel rubric v2.13.0, which added a band for brand or series evidence where the exact model is not covered by the third-party record.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Global score

Before

78.8

After

75.3

Durability (verified) pillar score

Before

72.5

After

57.5

Verified reliability

Before

Top Performer (multi-year)

After

Brand or series independently tested; exact model not covered

LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342): Evidence status

Before

Not previously recorded

After

sourced

LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342): Evidence sources

Before

Not previously recorded

After

Durability (verified) pillar score

Before

73.7

After

72.5

LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342)

Before

Not previously recorded

After

LeTID resistance claimed for this product, no test cited

Source revision

Current text

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly. Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded from the datasheet's own "superior resistance to PID, LID / LeTID" statement, previously logged as not stated. Manufacturer claim, no test cited. No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Global score

Before

79

After

78.8

Source revision

Current text

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly. Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded from the datasheet's own "superior resistance to PID, LID / LeTID" statement, previously logged as not stated. Manufacturer claim, no test cited. No score changes: the field is unscored.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Architecture & Design pillar score

Before

78.5

After

84.2

Damp heat extended (2000h)

Before

1000h IEC 61215 standard

After

No longer recorded

Damp heat extended (2000h): Evidence sources

Before

After

No longer recorded

Awards

Before

Not Listed

After

No longer recorded

Damp heat extended (2000h): Evidence status

Before

derived

After

No longer recorded

Awards: Evidence status

Before

reviewed_absence

After

No longer recorded

Durability (verified) pillar score

Before

73.9

After

73.7

Global score

Before

78

After

79

Awards: Evidence sources

Before

https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

After

No longer recorded

Source revision

Current text

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record scored a guaranteed end-of-warranty output of 87.40%, attributed to the exact datasheet. That datasheet does not contain the figure. Its only end-of-warranty value is 88.85%, and it publishes the matching 1% first-year and 0.35% annual rates on the same line; 87.40% is what Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model, whose warranty row reads 0.35% and 88.85%. The record also held the correct 0.35% rate, so its two values could not both be true: 1% in year one then 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%. The value was carried in both specs and specs_v4, and specs_v4 takes precedence when the two are merged for scoring, so correcting only the first would have changed nothing. No evidence changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee both the datasheet and the warranty publish is now recorded correctly.

The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.

Performance & Degradation pillar score

Before

73.1

After

78.4

Global score

Before

77

After

78

Guaranteed end-of-warranty output (%): Evidence sources

Before

https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

After

https://jinkosolar.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/LIMITED-WARRANTY-REV.AU20251210-LINEAR-BIFACIAL-MODULE.pdf; https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU.pdf

Guaranteed end-of-warranty output (%)

Before

87.4

After

88.85

Source revision

Before

Not previously recorded

After

Corrected 2026-08-18: the record carried 87.40% guaranteed output at year 30, which is the figure Jinko's warranty assigns to its half-cell HL4 and HL5 families, not to this quarter-cell QL6 model. The warranty row for JKMxxxN-66QL6-BDV reads 0.35% annual decline and 88.85% at year thirty, and the record already carried the matching 0.35% rate, so the two values it held could not both be true: 1% in year one followed by 0.35% for twenty-nine years arrives at 88.85%, not 87.40%. No evidence changed and no other value changed; the score rises from 77.0 to 78.0 because a guarantee the manufacturer does publish is now recorded correctly.