Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Global Tier-1

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass460–480 W

Jinko Solar | JKM460N-48QL6-DV through JKM480N-48QL6-DV (192 cells in a 48 by 4 layout, 48-cell format, N-type TOPCon, monofacial dual-glass); scored model JKM480N-48QL6-DV

48-cellN-type TOPConDual-glassMonofacial

68/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-31

24.02% EfficiencyClass-Leading Temp CoeffGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Global Tier-1

ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell605–640 W

Adani Solar | AB-G12R-132-605 through AB-G12R-132-640; scored model AB-G12R-132-640

66-cellN-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

60/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-02

BifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-GlassELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
Architecture & Design72 / 10068 / 100
Efficiency & Yield64 / 10063 / 100
Durability (verified)72 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10073 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone56 / 10046 / 100
Sustainability40 / 10046 / 100

Architecture & Design

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
72 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
68 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
64 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
63 / 100

Durability (verified)

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
72 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
78 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
73 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
56 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100

Sustainability

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
40 / 100
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
46 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-GlassELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
ArchitectureN-type TOPCon moduleN-type TOPCon module
Published rated power range460–480 W605–640 W
Scored benchmark480 W640 W
Power480 W640 W
Efficiency24.02 % (better value on this row)23.71 %
CellN-type TOPConN-type TOPCon
Temp coeff-0.26 %/°C (better value on this row)-0.28 %/°C

Architecture

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
N-type TOPCon module
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon module

Published rated power range

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
460–480 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
605–640 W

Scored benchmark

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
480 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Power

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
480 W
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
640 W

Efficiency

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
24.02 % (better value on this row)
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
23.71 %

Cell

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
N-type TOPCon
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
N-type TOPCon

Temp coeff

Tiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass
-0.26 %/°C (better value on this row)
ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell
-0.28 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass leads the global score by 8 points.
Strongest dimensionsTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass: Performance & Degradation · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass has the largest pillar edge in Durability (verified) (22 points).
Evidence coverageTiger Neo III 48-cell Dual-Glass: strong evidence coverage (100%) · ELAN SHINE G12R 66-cell: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Global Tier-1 class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.