Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Specialist & Local

Prime QD420–440 W

Silfab | SIL-440 QD NTC

Mono-glass

65/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

15+ Yrs Field-Proven
Full scorecard
Specialist & Local

108HC M10 NTYP420–450 W

Heliene | 108HC-450 M10 NTYP SL Bifacial

108 half-cell

65/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacial
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasurePrime QD108HC M10 NTYP
Architecture & Design54 / 10066 / 100
Efficiency & Yield59 / 10063 / 100
Durability (verified)66 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation78 / 10076 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone72 / 10084 / 100
Sustainability64 / 10047 / 100

Architecture & Design

Prime QD
54 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
66 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

Prime QD
59 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
63 / 100

Durability (verified)

Prime QD
66 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

Prime QD
78 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
76 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

Prime QD
72 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
84 / 100

Sustainability

Prime QD
64 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
47 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasurePrime QD108HC M10 NTYP
ArchitectureSolar moduleSolar module
Published rated power range420–440 W420–450 W
Scored benchmark440 W450 W
Power440 W450 W
Efficiency22.6 %23.04 % (better value on this row)
CellN-type siliconNot recorded
Temp coeff-0.29 %/°C (better value on this row)-0.3 %/°C

Architecture

Prime QD
Solar module
108HC M10 NTYP
Solar module

Published rated power range

Prime QD
420–440 W
108HC M10 NTYP
420–450 W

Scored benchmark

Prime QD
440 W
108HC M10 NTYP
450 W

Power

Prime QD
440 W
108HC M10 NTYP
450 W

Efficiency

Prime QD
22.6 %
108HC M10 NTYP
23.04 % (better value on this row)

Cell

Prime QD
N-type silicon
108HC M10 NTYP
Not recorded

Temp coeff

Prime QD
-0.29 %/°C (better value on this row)
108HC M10 NTYP
-0.3 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallThe products are tied at 65.
Strongest dimensionsPrime QD: Performance & Degradation · 108HC M10 NTYP: Guarantee & Backbone
Largest differencePrime QD has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (17 points).
Evidence coveragePrime QD: strong evidence coverage (100%) · 108HC M10 NTYP: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Specialist & Local class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.