Prime QD420–440 W
Silfab | SIL-440 QD NTC
65/ 100
Strong evidence coverage · 100%
Evidence checked 2026-09-01
Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.
Market context
Global benchmark
Silfab | SIL-440 QD NTC
65/ 100
Strong evidence coverage · 100%
Evidence checked 2026-09-01
Heliene | 108HC-450 M10 NTYP SL Bifacial
65/ 100
Strong evidence coverage · 100%
Evidence checked 2026-09-01
| Measure | Prime QD | 108HC M10 NTYP |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Design | ||
| Efficiency & Yield | ||
| Durability (verified) | ||
| Performance & Degradation | ||
| Guarantee & Backbone | ||
| Sustainability |
marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.
| Measure | Prime QD | 108HC M10 NTYP |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Solar module | Solar module |
| Published rated power range | 420–440 W | 420–450 W |
| Scored benchmark | 440 W | 450 W |
| Power | 440 W | 450 W |
| Efficiency | 22.6 % | 23.04 % (better value on this row) |
| Cell | N-type silicon | Not recorded |
| Temp coeff | -0.29 %/°C (better value on this row) | -0.3 %/°C |
A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.
Both products are scored in the Specialist & Local class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.