back to panels

Specialist & Local

Prime QD

420–440 W · N-type TOPCon · Mono-glass

SilfabReleased 2022

68/ 100

Very good

Global

15+ Yrs Field-Proven

The verdict. In our Specialist & Local class, Silfab Prime QD leads on performance & degradation.

3rdof 6 in Specialist & LocalTop halfclass average 65.6
Compare this panelAsk Watt →

The assessment

How it scores, by category

Architecture & Design66
Efficiency & Yield65
Durability (verified)62
Performance & Degradation78
Guarantee & Backbone76
Sustainability64

Market position

3rdof 6 in Specialist & LocalTop half
536972

Our reading

Prime QD scores 68, placing 3 of 6 in the Specialist & Local class against a class average of 65.6. Its strongest scoring dimension is performance & degradation (78), running 10.1 points above the class average on this dimension. Underlying specifications include a module efficiency of 22.6%, N-type TOPCon cell technology, 25-year product warranty backed by a 30-year performance term.

The data

Power
440W
Efficiency
22.6%
Cell
N-type TOPCon
Temp coeff
-0.29%/°C
Technology architecture

N-type TOPCon module

Architecture guide

Produces DC electricity at the roof. It contains no system-level power conversion or storage.

Product role
None in the module.
Published range
420–440 W
Electrical layer
DC module output
Construction
Mono-glass
Architecture describes the product boundary. It is not a system design or an equipment-pairing decision.

Performance guarantee: 30-year linear output

440 Wrated393W at yr 30
859095100Guaranteed floor 89.3%Product 25yr89.3%0yr5yr10yr15yr20yr25yr30yr
Projected outputGuaranteed floor: 89.3% at yr 30Product warranty ends yr 25

Wattage figure based on the sourced rated power (440 W) applied to the guaranteed floor; modular/format differences aside, this is the same rated-power spec shown above.

Modelled effective output, year by year

386W358W

Year 1 to year 25, at 30°C and 1000 W/m². Rated 440 W at STC.

How this is modelled

Compounds this panel’s own published first-year (2%) and annual (0.3%/yr) degradation figures against its 440 W rated (STC) output, then derates for the ambient and irradiance selected. Output is scaled roughly linearly with irradiance (1000W/m² against the 1000 W/m² STC reference). This is the dominant real-world effect at low light, whether from cloud, shading or soiling. Output is then further derated for heat, from this panel’s own NOCT (45°C) and temperature coefficient (-0.29%/°C), giving an estimated cell temperature of 61°C at that ambient and irradiance. A datasheet-derived estimate, not a field measurement or a warranty guarantee: it does not account for this panel’s own low-light efficiency response (a separate, less-consistently-published spec), or for wind and system design. See NOCT and temperature coefficient in the glossary.

Control panel

30°C
1000 W/m²
Year1510152025
Watts386 W381 W375 W369 W363 W358 W
% of rated87.7%86.6%85.3%83.9%82.6%81.3%
Before you buy
Local positionUse a market view to check local availability, approvals and warranty scope.
Ask the installerWill the quote name the exact Prime QD model and wattage, and who covers labour if the module warranty is used?

Verification & sources

Market context

Global evidencechange in the site menu

Global benchmark. This scorecard is benchmarked globally. A global score does not imply local availability, certification, warranty coverage, or installer compatibility.

Benchmark anchor. The score is anchored to the highest published rating in this exact series. Scored model: SIL-440 QD NTC · checked 2026-07-15. Evidence.

Sources & references · checked 2026-08-05

Strong evidence coverage

16 of 21 scored criteria link directly to a published source.

Values marked estimated, derived, or not found remain visible on the audit sheet and do not carry the same evidential weight as a linked source. Coverage measures direct links, not an independent guarantee that a claim is correct.

Record revision. Silfab SIL-440 QD US datasheet and product material reviewed 2026-07-15

Change ledger

Product record history

  1. Record updated

    Architecture & Design pillar score

    Before
    64.5
    After
    66.3
    Primary datasheet
  2. Record updated

    Durability (verified) pillar score

    Before
    61.8
    After
    62
    Primary datasheet
  3. Record updated

    Global score

    Before
    68.1
    After
    68.5
    Primary datasheet

This is review.solar's publication history. It does not claim the product changed on the recorded date, and it excludes compatibility, system pairing, installation suitability and relative leaderboard prose. Open the complete JSON record.

Evidence timeline

Recorded verification events for this scorecard. These are evidence checks, not historical score snapshots.

  1. Core scorecard evidence checked
  2. US market evidence checked
  3. Series benchmark evidence checked
  4. AU market evidence checked
  5. Plain-language warranty summary checked

Evidence record (JSON)

Scored by Solar Analytica Research

Further reading from Findings

Stay across the benchmark.

New scorecards, score changes and market signals, published as they happen.