Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Inverter

1-4KTL2-G31.1–4 kW

SOFAR | Current India catalogue family 1.1KTL2-G3, 1.6KTL2-G3, 2.2KTL2-G3, 2.7KTL2-G3, 3KTL2-G3, 3.3KTL2-G3 and 4KTL2-G3; scored model 4KTL2-G3

Single-phaseString1 MPPT

63/ 100

Good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-03

Fanless Design
Full scorecard
Inverter

SMILE-M-S Inverter8–9.999 kW

AlphaESS | SMILE-M8-S-INV, SMILE-M9-S-INV and SMILE-M10-S-INV; scored M10 at 9.999 kW local rating

Single-phaseHybridEssential-load backup4 MPPTs

68/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

Fanless Design
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

Measure1-4KTL2-G3SMILE-M-S Inverter
Efficiency68 / 100 (better value on this row)52 / 100
Design & Flexibility58 / 10096 / 100
Thermal & Physical Resilience80 / 10078 / 100
Features & Integration53 / 10080 / 100
Safety & Compliance74 / 10070 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone60 / 10054 / 100
Energy Ecosystem37 / 10040 / 100

Efficiency

1-4KTL2-G3
68 / 100 (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
52 / 100

Design & Flexibility

1-4KTL2-G3
58 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
96 / 100

Thermal & Physical Resilience

1-4KTL2-G3
80 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
78 / 100

Features & Integration

1-4KTL2-G3
53 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
80 / 100

Safety & Compliance

1-4KTL2-G3
74 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
70 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

1-4KTL2-G3
60 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
54 / 100

Energy Ecosystem

1-4KTL2-G3
37 / 100
SMILE-M-S Inverter
40 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

Measure1-4KTL2-G3SMILE-M-S Inverter
ArchitectureSolar-only string inverterHybrid inverter
Published rated AC power range1.1–4 kW8–9.999 kW
Scored benchmark4 kW9.999 kW
Power4.0 kW9.999 kW
TypeStringHybrid
Peak eff97.7 % (better value on this row)97.47 %
MPPTs14 (better value on this row)

Architecture

1-4KTL2-G3
Solar-only string inverter
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid inverter

Published rated AC power range

1-4KTL2-G3
1.1–4 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
8–9.999 kW

Scored benchmark

1-4KTL2-G3
4 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Power

1-4KTL2-G3
4.0 kW
SMILE-M-S Inverter
9.999 kW

Type

1-4KTL2-G3
String
SMILE-M-S Inverter
Hybrid

Peak eff

1-4KTL2-G3
97.7 % (better value on this row)
SMILE-M-S Inverter
97.47 %

MPPTs

1-4KTL2-G3
1
SMILE-M-S Inverter
4 (better value on this row)
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallSMILE-M-S Inverter leads the global score by 5 points.
Strongest dimensions1-4KTL2-G3: Thermal & Physical Resilience · SMILE-M-S Inverter: Design & Flexibility
Largest differenceSMILE-M-S Inverter has the largest pillar edge in Design & Flexibility (38 points).
Evidence coverage1-4KTL2-G3: strong evidence coverage (100%) · SMILE-M-S Inverter: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Inverter class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.