Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Inverter

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid8–15 kW

Solis | S6-EH3P8K02-NV-YD-L-AU / S6-EH3P9.9K02-NV-YD-L-AU / S6-EH3P10K02-NV-YD-L-AU / S6-EH3P12K02-NV-YD-L-AU / S6-EH3P15K02-NV-YD-L-AU; scored model S6-EH3P15K02-NV-YD-L-AU

Three-phaseHybridEssential-load backup2 MPPTs

72/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-07

AFCI IntegratedIP66 Rated
Full scorecard
Inverter

SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P7–9.999 kW

Deye | SUN-7K-SG05LP1-AU-AM2-P / SUN-7.6K-SG05LP1-AU-AM2-P / SUN-8K-SG05LP1-AU-AM2-P / SUN-10K-SG05LP1-AU-AM2-P; scored model SUN-10K-SG05LP1-AU-AM2-P

Single-phaseHybridEssential-load backup2 MPPTs

70/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-08-07

AFCI Integrated
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureS6 Three-phase LV HybridSUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
Efficiency56 / 10060 / 100 (better value on this row)
Design & Flexibility88 / 10083 / 100
Thermal & Physical Resilience81 / 10076 / 100
Features & Integration84 / 10084 / 100
Safety & Compliance78 / 10078 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone72 / 10072 / 100
Energy Ecosystem43 / 10036 / 100

Efficiency

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
56 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
60 / 100 (better value on this row)

Design & Flexibility

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
88 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
83 / 100

Thermal & Physical Resilience

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
81 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
76 / 100

Features & Integration

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
84 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
84 / 100

Safety & Compliance

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
78 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
78 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
72 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
72 / 100

Energy Ecosystem

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
43 / 100
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
36 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureS6 Three-phase LV HybridSUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
ArchitectureHybrid inverterHybrid inverter
Published rated AC power range8–15 kW7–9.999 kW
Scored benchmark15 kW9.999 kW
Power15.0 kW9.999 kW
TypeHybridHybrid
Peak eff97.5 %97.6 % (better value on this row)
MPPTs22

Architecture

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
Hybrid inverter
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
Hybrid inverter

Published rated AC power range

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
8–15 kW
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
7–9.999 kW

Scored benchmark

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
15 kW
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
9.999 kW

Power

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
15.0 kW
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
9.999 kW

Type

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
Hybrid
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
Hybrid

Peak eff

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
97.5 %
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
97.6 % (better value on this row)

MPPTs

S6 Three-phase LV Hybrid
2
SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P
2
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallS6 Three-phase LV Hybrid leads the global score by 2 points.
Strongest dimensionsS6 Three-phase LV Hybrid: Design & Flexibility · SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P: Features & Integration
Largest differenceS6 Three-phase LV Hybrid has the largest pillar edge in Energy Ecosystem (7 points).
Evidence coverageS6 Three-phase LV Hybrid: strong evidence coverage (100%) · SUN SG05 AU-AM2-P: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Inverter class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.