Specialist & Local
NGX-D3
WINAICO
69/ 100
Strong evidence coverage · 86%
Evidence checked 2026-06-16
15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard Score profile
| Measure | NGX-D3 | Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Design | ||
| Efficiency & Yield | ||
| Durability (verified) | ||
| Performance & Degradation | ||
| Guarantee & Backbone | ||
| Sustainability |
Architecture & Design
- NGX-D3
77 / 100 - Glass
83 / 100
Efficiency & Yield
- NGX-D3
63 / 100 - Glass
62 / 100
Durability (verified)
- NGX-D3
57 / 100 - Glass
59 / 100
Performance & Degradation
- NGX-D3
73 / 100 - Glass
89 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone
- NGX-D3
88 / 100 - Glass
62 / 100
Sustainability
- NGX-D3
55 / 100 - Glass
72 / 100
Key specifications
| Measure | NGX-D3 | Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Published rated power range | 430–450 W | 370–390 W |
| Scored benchmark | 450 W | 390 W |
| Power | 450 W | 390 W |
| Efficiency | 22.52 % | 21.8 % |
| Cell | TOPCon | Heterojunction |
| Temp coeff | -0.3 %/°C | -0.26 %/°C |
Published rated power range
- NGX-D3
- 430–450 W
- Glass
- 370–390 W
Scored benchmark
- NGX-D3
- 450 W
- Glass
- 390 W
Power
- NGX-D3
- 450 W
- Glass
- 390 W
Efficiency
- NGX-D3
- 22.52 %
- Glass
- 21.8 %
Cell
- NGX-D3
- TOPCon
- Glass
- Heterojunction
Temp coeff
- NGX-D3
- -0.3 %/°C
- Glass
- -0.26 %/°C
Where the comparison separates
OverallGlass leads the global score by 2 points.
Strongest dimensionsNGX-D3: Guarantee & Backbone · Glass: Performance & Degradation
Largest differenceNGX-D3 has the largest pillar edge in Guarantee & Backbone (26 points).
Evidence coverageNGX-D3: strong evidence coverage (86%) · Glass: limited evidence coverage (29%)
A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.
Both products are scored in the Specialist & Local class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.