Side-by-side

Compare

Compare like with like. Aligned scores, specifications and local evidence within one scoring class or tier.

Market context

Global benchmark

Specialist & Local

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass430–450 W

WINAICO | WST-450NGX-D3

N-type TOPConBifacialDual-glass

73/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacialGlass-Glass
Full scorecard
Specialist & Local

108HC M10 NTYP420–450 W

Heliene | 108HC-450 M10 NTYP SL Bifacial

108 half-cell

65/ 100

Very good

Strong evidence coverage · 100%

Evidence checked 2026-09-01

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenBifacial
Full scorecard
Side by side

Score profile

MeasureNGX-D3 Dual-Glass108HC M10 NTYP
Architecture & Design82 / 10066 / 100
Efficiency & Yield63 / 10063 / 100
Durability (verified)66 / 10050 / 100
Performance & Degradation73 / 10076 / 100
Guarantee & Backbone91 / 10084 / 100
Sustainability70 / 10047 / 100

Architecture & Design

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
82 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
66 / 100

Efficiency & Yield

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
63 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
63 / 100

Durability (verified)

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
66 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
50 / 100

Performance & Degradation

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
73 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
76 / 100

Guarantee & Backbone

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
91 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
84 / 100

Sustainability

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
70 / 100
108HC M10 NTYP
47 / 100
Side by side

Key specifications

marks the better value on rows where a higher number is better. Temperature coefficient counts as higher when it is closer to zero. Size measures such as rated power carry no marker, because a larger product is a different choice rather than a better one.

MeasureNGX-D3 Dual-Glass108HC M10 NTYP
ArchitectureN-type TOPCon moduleSolar module
Published rated power range430–450 W420–450 W
Scored benchmark450 W450 W
Power450 W450 W
Efficiency22.52 %23.04 % (better value on this row)
CellN-type TOPConNot recorded
Temp coeff-0.3 %/°C-0.3 %/°C

Architecture

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
N-type TOPCon module
108HC M10 NTYP
Solar module

Published rated power range

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
430–450 W
108HC M10 NTYP
420–450 W

Scored benchmark

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
450 W
108HC M10 NTYP
450 W

Power

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
450 W
108HC M10 NTYP
450 W

Efficiency

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
22.52 %
108HC M10 NTYP
23.04 % (better value on this row)

Cell

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
N-type TOPCon
108HC M10 NTYP
Not recorded

Temp coeff

NGX-D3 Dual-Glass
-0.3 %/°C
108HC M10 NTYP
-0.3 %/°C
Decision snapshot

Where the comparison separates

OverallNGX-D3 Dual-Glass leads the global score by 8 points.
Strongest dimensionsNGX-D3 Dual-Glass: Guarantee & Backbone · 108HC M10 NTYP: Guarantee & Backbone
Largest differenceNGX-D3 Dual-Glass has the largest pillar edge in Sustainability (23 points).
Evidence coverageNGX-D3 Dual-Glass: strong evidence coverage (100%) · 108HC M10 NTYP: strong evidence coverage (100%)

A score lead is only meaningful inside this shared class or tier. Weigh it against the specification and evidence rows above before deciding.

Both products are scored in the Specialist & Local class, on the same rubric weighting. Scores are not comparable across classes or tiers. Full methodology.