The assessment
How it scores, by category
Market position
The data
N-type TOPCon module
Produces DC electricity at the roof. It contains no system-level power conversion or storage.
- Product role
- None in the module.
- Published range
- 590–610 W
- Electrical layer
- DC module output
- Construction
- Bifacial, Dual-glass
Performance guarantee: 30-year linear output
Wattage figure based on the sourced rated power (610 W) applied to the guaranteed floor; modular/format differences aside, this is the same rated-power spec shown above.
Modelled effective output, year by year
Year 1 to year 25, at 30°C and 1000 W/m². Rated 610 W at STC.
How this is modelled
Compounds this panel’s own published first-year (1%) and annual (0.4%/yr) degradation figures against its 610 W rated (STC) output, then derates for the ambient and irradiance selected. Output is scaled roughly linearly with irradiance (1000W/m² against the 1000 W/m² STC reference). This is the dominant real-world effect at low light, whether from cloud, shading or soiling. Output is then further derated for heat, from this panel’s own NOCT (45°C) and temperature coefficient (-0.29%/°C), giving an estimated cell temperature of 61°C at that ambient and irradiance. A datasheet-derived estimate, not a field measurement or a warranty guarantee: it does not account for this panel’s own low-light efficiency response (a separate, less-consistently-published spec), or for wind and system design. See NOCT and temperature coefficient in the glossary.
Control panel
| Year | 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watts | 540 W | 532 W | 521 W | 510 W | 499 W | 488 W |
| % of rated | 88.6% | 87.2% | 85.4% | 83.6% | 81.8% | 80.0% |
Verification & sources
Market context
Global evidencechange in the site menu
Global benchmark. This scorecard is benchmarked globally. A global score does not imply local availability, certification, warranty coverage, or installer compatibility.
Benchmark anchor. The score is anchored to the highest published Australian rating in this exact series. Scored model: JKM610N-72HL4-BDV · checked 2026-08-06. Evidence.
Sources & references · checked 2026-08-19
Strong evidence coverage
24 of 29 scored criteria link directly to a published source.
Values marked estimated, derived, or not found remain visible on the audit sheet and do not carry the same evidential weight as a linked source. Coverage measures direct links, not an independent guarantee that a claim is correct.
Record correction. Jinko JKM590-610N-72HL4-BDV D1 EN sheet and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20231101 reviewed 2026-08-06 Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded as resistant on a PVEL third-party test result (LID+LETID passed) that the record already quoted under its PID provenance while this field read "not stated on datasheet". No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance. Re-verification 2026-08-19: Verified reliability recorded as "Top Performer (current/partial)" under panel rubric v2.13.0, which added a band for brand or series evidence where the exact model is not covered by the third-party record.
- Sourced valuesData card →
- Warranty summary12-year product warranty →
Show 5 more
- Archived copy of the primary sourcePDF ↗
- LeTID / LID resistanceIndependent test ↗
- Independent energy yieldIndependent test ↗
- Financial strength & warranty backingManufacturer ↗
- LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342)Independent test ↗
Product record history
4 changes to this record · 31 products changed in this update
Verified reliability
- Before
- Top Performer (multi-year)
- After
- Top Performer (current/partial)
Source revision
- Current text
- Jinko JKM590-610N-72HL4-BDV D1 EN sheet and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20231101 reviewed 2026-08-06 Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded as resistant on a PVEL third-party test result (LID+LETID passed) that the record already quoted under its PID provenance while this field read "not stated on datasheet". No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance. Re-verification 2026-08-19: Verified reliability recorded as "Top Performer (current/partial)" under panel rubric v2.13.0, which added a band for brand or series evidence where the exact model is not covered by the third-party record.
The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.
Primary datasheet
6 changes to this record · 23 products changed in this update
LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342): Evidence status
- Before
- Not previously recorded
- After
- sourced
Source revision
- Current text
- Jinko JKM590-610N-72HL4-BDV D1 EN sheet and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20231101 reviewed 2026-08-06 Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded as resistant on a PVEL third-party test result (LID+LETID passed) that the record already quoted under its PID provenance while this field read "not stated on datasheet". No score changes: the field is unscored. LeTID re-verified 2026-08-19 for rubric v2.12.0: scored under the returned criterion on the evidence recorded in its provenance.
The previous text is not reproduced here: both versions run to a full research paragraph. Both are in the JSON record linked below.
Primary datasheetLeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342): Evidence sources
- Before
- Not previously recorded
- After
- https://scorecard.pvel.com/top-performers
LeTID resistance (IEC TS 63342)
- Before
- Not previously recorded
- After
- Tested (IEC TS 63342): result published
1 change to this record · 9 products changed in this update
Source revision
- Before
- Jinko JKM590-610N-72HL4-BDV D1 EN sheet and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20231101 reviewed 2026-08-06
- After
- Jinko JKM590-610N-72HL4-BDV D1 EN sheet and AU/NZ bifacial warranty Rev AU20231101 reviewed 2026-08-06 Corrected 2026-08-19: LeTID recorded as resistant on a PVEL third-party test result (LID+LETID passed) that the record already quoted under its PID provenance while this field read "not stated on datasheet". No score changes: the field is unscored.
9 changes to this record · 106 products changed in this update
Damp heat extended (2000h)
- Before
- 1000h IEC 61215 standard
- After
- No longer recorded
Damp heat extended (2000h): Evidence status
- Before
- derived
- After
- No longer recorded
Damp heat extended (2000h): Evidence sources
- Before
- After
- No longer recorded
Awards: Evidence sources
- Before
- https://www.jinkosolar.com/uploads/JKM575-600N-72HL4-BDV-F9-EN.pdf
- After
- No longer recorded
This is review.solar's publication history. It does not claim the product changed on the recorded date, and it excludes compatibility, system pairing, installation suitability and relative leaderboard prose. Open the complete JSON record.
Evidence timeline
Recorded verification events for this scorecard. These are evidence checks, not historical score snapshots.
- Core scorecard evidence checked
- AU market evidence checked
- Series benchmark evidence checked
- US market evidence checked
- Plain-language warranty summary checked
Scored by Solar Analytica Research
Stay across the benchmark.
New scorecards, score changes and market signals, published as they happen.
Our reading
Tiger Neo 72HL4-BDV sits at the top of the Global Tier-1 class with 76 points against a class average of 66.1. Its strongest scoring dimension is sustainability (100), running 36.1 points above the class average on this dimension. Underlying specifications include a module efficiency of 23.61%, N-type TOPCon cell technology, 12-year product warranty backed by a 30-year performance term.