back to panels

Global Tier-1

Vertex S+ NEG9R.28 72-cell

430–460 W · 72-cell · N-type TOPCon · Dual-glass · Monofacial

Trina SolarReleased 2024

70/ 100

Very good

Global

15+ Yrs Field-ProvenGlass-Glass

The verdict. In our Global Tier-1 class, Trina Solar Vertex S+ NEG9R.28 72-cell leads on guarantee & backbone.

17thof 52 in Global Tier-1Top halfclass average 67.1
Compare this panelAsk Watt →

The assessment

How it scores, by category

Architecture & Design78
Efficiency & Yield69
Durability (verified)57
Performance & Degradation73
Guarantee & Backbone80
Sustainability64

Market position

17thof 52 in Global Tier-1Top half
527077

Our reading

Vertex S+ NEG9R.28 72-cell scores 70, placing 17 of 52 in the Global Tier-1 class against a class average of 67.1. Its strongest scoring dimension is guarantee & backbone (80), running 18.8 points above the class average on this dimension. Durability (verified) (57) is the dimension with the most room to move. Underlying specifications include a module efficiency of 23.0%, N-type TOPCon cell technology, 25-year product warranty backed by a 30-year performance term.

The data

Power
460W
Efficiency
23.0%
Cell
N-type TOPCon
Temp coeff
-0.29%/°C
Technology architecture

N-type TOPCon module

Architecture guide

Produces DC electricity at the roof. It contains no system-level power conversion or storage.

Product role
None in the module.
Published range
430–460 W
Electrical layer
DC module output
Construction
Monofacial, Dual-glass
Architecture describes the product boundary. It is not a system design or an equipment-pairing decision.

Performance guarantee: 30-year linear output

460 Wrated402W at yr 30
80859095100Guaranteed floor 87.4%Product 25yr87.4%0yr5yr10yr15yr20yr25yr30yr
Projected outputGuaranteed floor: 87.4% at yr 30Product warranty ends yr 25

Wattage figure based on the sourced rated power (460 W) applied to the guaranteed floor; modular/format differences aside, this is the same rated-power spec shown above.

Modelled effective output, year by year

411W371W

Year 1 to year 25, at 30°C and 1000 W/m². Rated 460 W at STC.

How this is modelled

Compounds this panel’s own published first-year (1%) and annual (0.4%/yr) degradation figures against its 460 W rated (STC) output, then derates for the ambient and irradiance selected. Output is scaled roughly linearly with irradiance (1000W/m² against the 1000 W/m² STC reference). This is the dominant real-world effect at low light, whether from cloud, shading or soiling. Output is then further derated for heat, from this panel’s own NOCT (43°C) and temperature coefficient (-0.29%/°C), giving an estimated cell temperature of 59°C at that ambient and irradiance. A datasheet-derived estimate, not a field measurement or a warranty guarantee: it does not account for this panel’s own low-light efficiency response (a separate, less-consistently-published spec), or for wind and system design. See NOCT and temperature coefficient in the glossary.

Control panel

30°C
1000 W/m²
Year1510152025
Watts411 W404 W396 W388 W379 W371 W
% of rated89.3%87.9%86.1%84.3%82.5%80.6%
Before you buy
Local positionUse a market view to check local availability, approvals and warranty scope.
Ask the installerWill the quote name the exact Vertex S+ NEG9R.28 72-cell model and wattage, and who covers labour if the module warranty is used?

Verification & sources

Market context

Global evidencechange in the site menu

Global benchmark. This scorecard is benchmarked globally. A global score does not imply local availability, certification, warranty coverage, or installer compatibility.

Benchmark anchor. The score uses the highest exact current rating established for the retained market scope. Scored model: TSM-460NEG9R.28 · checked 2026-08-08. Evidence.

Sources & references · checked 2026-08-08

Strong evidence coverage

24 of 24 scored criteria link directly to a published source.

Values marked estimated, derived, or not found remain visible on the audit sheet and do not carry the same evidential weight as a linked source. Coverage measures direct links, not an independent guarantee that a claim is correct.

Evidence timeline

Recorded verification events for this scorecard. These are evidence checks, not historical score snapshots.

  1. Core scorecard evidence checked
  2. Series benchmark source checked
  3. AU market evidence checked

Scored by Solar Analytica Research

Further reading from Signals

Stay across the benchmark.

New scorecards, score changes and market signals, published as they happen.